1998
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112098002420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary layer development after a separated region

Abstract: Measurements obtained in boundary layers developing downstream of the highly turbulent, separated flow generated at the leading edge of a blunt flat plate are presented. Two cases are considered : first, when there is only very low (wind tunnel) turbulence present in the free-stream flow and, second, when roughly isotropic, homogeneous turbulence is introduced. With conditions adjusted to ensure that the separated region was of the same length in both cases, the flow around reattachment was significantly diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
35
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, hu 0 u 0 i and hu 0 v 0 i are amplified by a factor 7-10 at a distance of three boundary layer thicknesses downstream of average reattachment (x/d 0 & 8 in Fig. 5), which is in agreement with the enhancement of the Reynolds stresses downstream of a laminar separation, as reported by Castro and Epik (1998). Moreover, the order of magnitudes of the Reynolds stresses is consistent with results obtained just behind a turbulent separation (Alving and Fernholz 1996).…”
Section: Reynolds Stressessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, hu 0 u 0 i and hu 0 v 0 i are amplified by a factor 7-10 at a distance of three boundary layer thicknesses downstream of average reattachment (x/d 0 & 8 in Fig. 5), which is in agreement with the enhancement of the Reynolds stresses downstream of a laminar separation, as reported by Castro and Epik (1998). Moreover, the order of magnitudes of the Reynolds stresses is consistent with results obtained just behind a turbulent separation (Alving and Fernholz 1996).…”
Section: Reynolds Stressessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This occurred after the boundary layer reached a Reynolds number based on momentum thickness of 2,175, which, for the present conditions (U e = 0.21 m/s), is estimated to be 4.6 m (*1,000d 0 ) downstream of the trip. Similarly, the dominance of energetic and very slowly decaying largescale flow structures was also observed from the spectra taken downstream of the turbulent reattachment of a laminar separation bubble (Castro and Epik 1998).…”
Section: Large-scale Energetic Modesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…On the contrary, shed vortices with vorticity in z, i.e. the recirculation-like structures present for the Saw case and also reported in Alving and Fernholz (1996) and Castro and Epik (1998), would enhance the wake influence on the wall generating a wake-driven mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These trips with non-uniform blockage create a distorted wake which, after an adaptation region, may influence the formation of the inner structures up to a larger extent than in the former case, where the inner structures may not be as disturbed due to the low blockage at y = 0. This influence of the wake in the near-wall region has also been reported as a characteristic of re-attached flows downstream of a separation (Alving and Fernholz 1996;Castro and Epik 1998). Different heights and degrees of immersion in the boundary layer are tested in order to assess the influence of these parameters on the recovery length for canonical properties of the generated boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For laminar separation, as in the current case, the transition could be delayed leading to a longer bubble than the case for turbulent separation. A relevant type of flow to the FFS is the blunt plate experiment of Castro and Epik [13] (Re D = 6500) in which the reattachment is reported to be 7.7D, where D is the plate thickness. This is comparable to the mean reattachment length for the current simulation.…”
Section: Mean Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%