1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00918768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary-layer receptivity to acoustic disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the numerous efforts, comparisons between the predictions of the asymptotic theory of receptivity and the numerical and experimental results are very limited. Comparisons with experiments can be found for example in Goldstein & Hultgren (1987), Kozlov & Ryzhov (1990) and Wu (2001), while detailed comparisons with the predictions of the finite-Reynolds number Orr-Sommerfeld theory (Zhigulev & Fedorov 1987;Choudhari & Street 1992;Crouch 1992) are reported in Choudhari & Street (1992). However, the range of parameters over which the asymptotic theory has been compared with high-fidelity Navier-Stokes numerical simulations and/or experiments is very limited, hence a detailed evaluation of the capabilities of the theory is currently missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the numerous efforts, comparisons between the predictions of the asymptotic theory of receptivity and the numerical and experimental results are very limited. Comparisons with experiments can be found for example in Goldstein & Hultgren (1987), Kozlov & Ryzhov (1990) and Wu (2001), while detailed comparisons with the predictions of the finite-Reynolds number Orr-Sommerfeld theory (Zhigulev & Fedorov 1987;Choudhari & Street 1992;Crouch 1992) are reported in Choudhari & Street (1992). However, the range of parameters over which the asymptotic theory has been compared with high-fidelity Navier-Stokes numerical simulations and/or experiments is very limited, hence a detailed evaluation of the capabilities of the theory is currently missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In succeeding years, this approach led to the formulation of the biorthogonal eigenfunction system [36][37][38][39][40], which turned out to be a powerful technique in solving receptivity problems for spatially developing perturbations. The bulk of the results obtained with this approach were presented by Fedorov [41], including receptivity to acoustic waves interacting with a weakly nonparallel boundary layer [42], TS excitation by a local forcing [39][40], and receptivity to acoustic waves interacting with a wall waviness or a local roughness element [43] (see also [44]). However, the aforementioned results at finite Reynolds numbers were prone to uncertainty in the path of integration in the inverse Fourier transform at supercritical frequencies of the forcing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adjoint methods have recently been used to predict the receptivity characteristics of a wide range of flows including pipe Poiseuille flow, 15 the Blasius boundary layer, 9,12,18 laminar wall jets, 17 and Görtler vortices in boundary layers on concave surfaces. 11 With the exception of the work of Luchini & Bottaro, 11 all of these studies rely on the expansion of the homogeneous solution to the locally parallel flow into a biorthogonal set of eigenfunctions as described by Salwen & Grosch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%