33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1995
DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary layer receptivity to freestream vortical disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A quantitative comparison of the experimental results with those of theory requires that the boundary-layer signature of the free-stream disturbance used in the calculation matches that measured in the experiment (figure 8). The convected array of vortices introduced by Rogler & Reshotko (1975) and used by Crouch (1994a, b) and Lin et al (1995) in their receptivity calculations has quite a different signature in the boundary layer than that measured in this experiment. The array of vortices produces a much higher fluctuation gradient close to the edge of the boundary layer (see Crouch 1994b, figure 2).…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Theorycontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A quantitative comparison of the experimental results with those of theory requires that the boundary-layer signature of the free-stream disturbance used in the calculation matches that measured in the experiment (figure 8). The convected array of vortices introduced by Rogler & Reshotko (1975) and used by Crouch (1994a, b) and Lin et al (1995) in their receptivity calculations has quite a different signature in the boundary layer than that measured in this experiment. The array of vortices produces a much higher fluctuation gradient close to the edge of the boundary layer (see Crouch 1994b, figure 2).…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Theorycontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Detailed reviews are given in Choudhari & Streett (1994) and Crouch (1994a). A comparison between finite Reynolds number results and results of calculations using the parabolized stability equations made by Crouch & Bertolotti (1992) for acoustic receptivity and by Lin, Stuckert & Herbert (1995) for vortical receptivity, showed the two methods to be in agreement. A further comparison between the results of finite Reynolds number calculations and those of a direct numerical simulation of acoustic receptivity at localized surface suction made by Crouch & Spalart (1995) also showed good agreement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…32-34,8, and 35-38͒. The work of Crouch,37 and a later study by Lin, Stuckert and Herbert, 38 modeled the scattering of the two-dimensional vortex-array pattern of Rogler and Reshotko 20 ͑our mode ''A''͒ by small amplitude surface undulation to study the effect of free-stream turbulence on the growth of Tollmien-Schlichting waves. The scattering process is needed to convert the phase speed of the free-stream disturbances into a value close to that of the TS waves, as shown by Ruban 32 and Goldstein 33 in their study of acoustic waves and localized surface irregularities.…”
Section: Receptivity Of Unsteady Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%