Boundary Objects: Engaging and Bridging Needs of People in Participatory Research by Arts-Based Methods

Abstract

Background: Participatory health research (PHR) is a research approach in which people, including hidden populations, share lived experiences about health inequities to improve their situation through collective action. Boundary objects are produced, using arts-based methods, to be heard by stakeholders. These can bring about dialogue, connection, and involvement in a mission for social justice. This study aims to gain insight into the value and ethical issues of boundary objects that address health inequalities. A qualitative evaluation is conducted on three different boundary objects, created in different participatory studies with marginalized populations (mothers in poverty, psychiatric patients, and unemployed people). A successful boundary object evokes emotions among those who created the objects and those encountering these objects. Such objects move people and create an impulse for change. The more provocative the object, the more people feel triggered to foster change. Boundary objects may cross personal boundaries and could provoke feelings of discomfort and ignorance. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to ethics work. Boundary objects that are made by people from hidden populations may spur actions and create influence by improving the understanding of the needs of hidden populations. A dialogue about these needs is an essential step towards social justice.

Crossing boundaries in the delivery of healthcare – a qualitative study of an eHealth intervention in relation to boundary object theory

“… 16 , 35 However, working with BO is not without challenges as the non-hierarchical collaborative form demands sufficient time and effort to build trust, contemplation, remembrance and other forms of emotional and embodied engagement. 39 There are conditions that need to be met for BOs to travel among heterogeneous actors in healthcare. To ensure transferability, it is essential that local meanings are stripped off to give a universal outlook while abstract and standardised representation should be made contextually useable.…”

It’s Our Story: Parents and Carers’ Experiences during the Pandemic

“…As Groot and Abma (2021) have noted, in contributing to arts based participatory methods, participants ‘must often cross a threshold to overcome shame or pain, in order to make their experiences visible, and bring them out in the open’ (p. 7). As researchers, we were therefore led by a feminist ethics of care (see Holland et al, 2014; Tronto, 1994) prior to, during, and following zine workshops.…”

Curtailing invisibility of health and safety risks

“…The application of this situational model to invisibility leads to three main research aspects: firstly, the properties of the emitting object, secondly the flaws or interruptions in the transmission path between the object and the observer, and thirdly, the properties of the observer, influenced by e.g. limitations, attitude, prejudice or epistemic injustice (Fricker, 2017;Groot, Haveman & Abma, 2020;Groot & Abma, 2021), see (Figure 1).…”