2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2018.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary representation of Dirichlet forms on discrete spaces

Abstract: We describe the set of all Dirichlet forms associated to a given infinite graph in terms of Dirichlet forms on its Royden boundary. Our approach is purely analytical and uses form methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the forms t G and t (N ) G coincide if and only if H is the unique positive self-adjoint extension of H 0 (this in particular holds if H 0 is essentially self-adjoint). We are not aware of a description of the self-adjoint operator H N associated with the form t (N ) G if the pre-minimal operator has nontrivial deficiency indices (however, see the recent work [13,38]). Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, the description of deficiency indices of H 0 and its self-adjoint extensions is a widely open problem.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the forms t G and t (N ) G coincide if and only if H is the unique positive self-adjoint extension of H 0 (this in particular holds if H 0 is essentially self-adjoint). We are not aware of a description of the self-adjoint operator H N associated with the form t (N ) G if the pre-minimal operator has nontrivial deficiency indices (however, see the recent work [13,38]). Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, the description of deficiency indices of H 0 and its self-adjoint extensions is a widely open problem.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in this case the end compactification G of G coincides with several other spaces, among them the metric completion of G and the Royden compactification of a related discrete graph (see [27,Corollary 4.22] and also [26, p. 1526]). Let us also stress that the latter was employed recently in a description of Markovian extensions of discrete Laplacians [41]. The metric completion G was considered in connection with quantum graphs in [10,11]; however, G can have a rather complicated structure if vol(G) = ∞ and a further analysis usually requires additional assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us finish this introduction with two more comments concerning Theorem 6.11. First of all, results related to Theorem 6.11 were proven recently in [41], which provides a description of Markovian extensions for discrete Laplacians on graphs in terms of Royden's boundary. On the one hand, taking into account certain close relationships between quantum graphs and discrete Laplacians (see [20, §4]), one can easily obtain the results analogous to Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 6.11 for a particular class of discrete Laplacians on G d defined by the following expression…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this type of construction is essentially known, see e.g. [3, Proof of Theorem 6.6.5] or [11] for Dirichlet forms on graphs, we only give a brief sketch and leave details to the reader.…”
Section: Reflected Regular Dirichlet Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%