2016
DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2016.1165633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary shear stress distribution for a converging compound channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study incorporates the works of Rezaei (2006), Naik and Khatua (2016), as well as the experimental data collected by the author. Table 1 presents data about the experimental channel dimensions of compound channels with different geometric features.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study incorporates the works of Rezaei (2006), Naik and Khatua (2016), as well as the experimental data collected by the author. Table 1 presents data about the experimental channel dimensions of compound channels with different geometric features.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of shear stress increases with the augmentation of surface roughness on the floodplain. The researchers Naik and Khatua (2016) proposed a novel equation that allows for the estimation of the distribution of boundary shear stress by using non-dimensional geometric and flow variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop the mentioned artificial intelligence models,196 Laboratory data of Othman (2000); Bousmar (2002aBousmar ( , 2002b, Rezaei & Knight (2009), Yonesi et al (2013), andKhatua (2016) have been used Table 1 shows the statistical characteristics of the collected data.…”
Section: Non-prismatic Compound Open Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 , MAE, RMSE, and MAPE for different series of datasets, the established GEP model show superior outcomes in comparison to other methods as Naik and Khatua[48], Khatua et al[46], Knight and Hamed[17], Mohanty et al[54]. The GEP approach's compatibility is determined by the model's mean percentage of error and the approaches' suitability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%