2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Shear Stress in an Ice-Covered River during Breakup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the momentum exchanges are intense at the canopy-gap interface. In addition, Zare et al (2016) confirmed that the shear stress varied dynamically with transformation of the ice cover, and the upper boundary shear stress is many times larger than the lower boundary shear stress during the solid ice cover to the ice cover removal, which is strongly similar to the gaps of vegetation cover. Therefore, the maximum of shear stress occurred at the water-vegetation interface, and the location of zero shear stress is close to the bed region in terms of the linear distribution.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, the momentum exchanges are intense at the canopy-gap interface. In addition, Zare et al (2016) confirmed that the shear stress varied dynamically with transformation of the ice cover, and the upper boundary shear stress is many times larger than the lower boundary shear stress during the solid ice cover to the ice cover removal, which is strongly similar to the gaps of vegetation cover. Therefore, the maximum of shear stress occurred at the water-vegetation interface, and the location of zero shear stress is close to the bed region in terms of the linear distribution.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 62%
“…This finding is similar to the results of Attar and Li. (2013) and Zare et al (2016). The reason maybe is the intense turbulence caused by the vegetation gaps and the broken up ice.…”
Section: Shear Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinematic viscosity of water (m) is equal to 1.79 3 10 26 m 2 /s at 08C, as is likely for the authors' experimental conditions. From the data presented in Zare et al [2016b], a typical value for u *i is 0.02 m/s. Consequently, equation (9) would apply so long as k si > $70 3 1.79 3 10 26 /0.02 5 0.0063 m; it follows from equation (12) (which is obviously mistyped), that n i should exceed $0.047 3 0.0063 1/6 or 0.02.…”
Section: Possible Deficiencies Of Reported Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second source of potentially serious error is related to the fact that the upper flow layer often included a slowly moving and thick sublayer of frazil slush [Zare et al, 2016b]. The resulting velocity profiles were strikingly nonlogarithmic.…”
Section: Possible Deficiencies Of Reported Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation