2008
DOI: 10.3826/jhr.2008.3203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary shear stress in open channel flow: A comparison among six methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Lundgren and Jonsson [1964] recognized that the concept of “flow depth” is not valid, particularly if the side slope is steep. Also, Khodashenas et al [2008] showed that this approach generates large errors even for flows in open prismatic channels with trapezoidal cross‐sectional geometry. Alternatively, Khodashenas and Paquier [1999] proposed a geometrical method to compute the boundary shear stress distribution in open channels with an irregular cross‐sectional geometry.…”
Section: Sediment Modeling Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Lundgren and Jonsson [1964] recognized that the concept of “flow depth” is not valid, particularly if the side slope is steep. Also, Khodashenas et al [2008] showed that this approach generates large errors even for flows in open prismatic channels with trapezoidal cross‐sectional geometry. Alternatively, Khodashenas and Paquier [1999] proposed a geometrical method to compute the boundary shear stress distribution in open channels with an irregular cross‐sectional geometry.…”
Section: Sediment Modeling Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each region, the hydraulic radius is estimated as the ratio between the wetted area and the wetted perimeter. Khodashenas et al (2008) performed a comparison among several analytical methods for computing the τ distribution and laboratory data for several channel shapes (rectangular, trapezoidal, and compound) and roughness. They came to the conclusion that analytical methods similar to the one used in BSTEM provide a suitable estimation of the τ distribution, except near corners and at the edge of the cross-section.…”
Section: Modeling Fluvial Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulics shows that the erosion of the earthen channels is a direct function of the shear stress distribution on the wetted perimeter, which varies with the geometric shape (Depeweg et al 2015, Dey 2014, Khodashenas et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%