Boundary spanners: a critical role for enduring collaborations between Indigenous communities and mainstream scientists

Abstract

The need to diversify science includes increasing both the diversity of science practitioners and the voices included in decision-making processes. Indigenous communities have been sought out to provide Indigenous knowledge to mainstream science research programs. As working across the mainstream science and community boundary is increasingly codified into the future of natural sciences, models for equitable collaboration and roles within project structures are needed. The goal of this project is to present a framework for collaboration between mainstream science and Indigenous communities. Specifically, we are addressing an underrecognized role central to partnership, a boundary spanner, who acts as the fulcrum facilitating collaboration. To better understand the role of boundary spanners in collaborative projects, we engaged six boundary spanners who participated in semi-structured interviews and workshops. Emergent common experiences and perspectives of how boundary spanners can be supported and their role in collaborative projects were defined and articulated. The boundary spanners identified 10 characteristics that contribute to equitable partnership between mainstream science and Indigenous communities. From the perspective of the boundary spanners, they detailed how collaborative projects can be structured to increase long-term partnerships and community support of research projects. Equitable collaboration between Indigenous communities and mainstream science is frequently only achieved when individuals at the interface of the mainstream science and Indigenous community have a high level of cultural competency. Equally important is the support provided to the boundary spanners and early engagement of partner Indigenous communities. Through the use of story and metaphor, we highlight the voices of boundary spanners and how their contributions can best be used.

Enabling successful science‐policy knowledge exchange between marine biodiversity research and management: An Australian case study

“…Therefore, future discussions of KE within the NESP hubs may well focus on the central roles of Traditional Owners in a future process which would have vast opportunity and importance as recently highlighted for collaborations between Indigenous communities and scientists from Western academic systems (Hatch et al, 2023). Here, we discuss those different boundary spanning roles and reflect on how they contributed to the effectiveness of KE.…”