2020
DOI: 10.3390/math9010007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Values in Ultradistribution Spaces Related to Extended Gevrey Regularity

Abstract: Following the well-known theory of Beurling and Roumieu ultradistributions, we investigate new spaces of ultradistributions as dual spaces of test functions which correspond to associated functions of logarithmic-type growth at infinity. In the given framework we prove that boundary values of analytic functions with the corresponding logarithmic growth rate towards the real domain are ultradistributions. The essential condition for that purpose, known as stability under ultradifferential operators in the class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the notation (M.2) , resp. (M.2), comes from [19], while in [17,18,20] (M.2) , resp. (M.2), is used.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that the notation (M.2) , resp. (M.2), comes from [19], while in [17,18,20] (M.2) , resp. (M.2), is used.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions (M.2) and (M.2) are different from the classical ones, namely (dc) and (mg), appearing in the literature when dealing with Carleman-like classes (see [13]). They play a prominent role in the study of the corresponding ultradifferentiable and ultradistributional classes carried out by S. Pilipović, N. Teofanov and F. Tomić in [17,18,19,20], as they allow for a precise control of the flexibility obtained by introducing the two parameter dependence.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On each such interval of indices the mapping q → b q is now clearly strictly increasing since 1 + δ j > 1 for all j. Moreover, by the first half in (20), we have b p j+1 −1 = (1 + δ j ) p j+1 −p j −1 a p j < b p j+1 . Hence the sequence q → b q is strictly increasing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We conclude if we show that b q ≤ Aa q for all q with 1 + p j ≤ q ≤ p j+1 − 1, j ≥ 0. For this, since q → b q is strictly increasing, it suffices to observe that, thanks to the second half in (20), we have b…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%