1985
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2738(85)90001-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounded diffusion in solid solution electrode powder compacts. Part I. The interfacial impedance of a solid solution electrode (MxSSE) in contact with a m+-ion conducting electrolyte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure allows the assumption of semi‐infinite conditions where c 0 , the initial concentration of lithium in the bulk of the material, is unchanged by the polarization step. [ 21,34 ] To extract the lithium diffusion coefficient assuming semi‐infinite boundary condition, the voltage relaxation measurements were interpreted using the same method as in our previous study. [ 21 ] Briefly, the open circuit potential V OC was assumed to evolve with time according to the following equation VOCsitV02πIZnormalW[]ttτ with ZnormalW= WRTz2F2Ac0trueD˜Li …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure allows the assumption of semi‐infinite conditions where c 0 , the initial concentration of lithium in the bulk of the material, is unchanged by the polarization step. [ 21,34 ] To extract the lithium diffusion coefficient assuming semi‐infinite boundary condition, the voltage relaxation measurements were interpreted using the same method as in our previous study. [ 21 ] Briefly, the open circuit potential V OC was assumed to evolve with time according to the following equation VOCsitV02πIZnormalW[]ttτ with ZnormalW= WRTz2F2Ac0trueD˜Li …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a nonstoichiometric mixed‐conducting material such as NCM, the thermodynamic factor is W=ln(aLi)ln(cLi) and can be calculated from V 0 versus c Li data recorded during the experiment, i.e., from the lithium activity as function of the lithium concentration. [ 34,35 ] This parameter represents the activity change of lithium as a function of the state of charge of the CAM and is therefore morphology independent (Figure S2b, Supporting Information). It has to be noted that this method is only applicable for materials exhibiting a solid solution mechanism for ion (de)intercalation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Randles' equivalent circuit, while not the only possible representation, has frequently been employed to represent modified electrochemical interfaces, ,,, and in the present case provides an excellent fit of the data. The diffusion element in the Randles' equivalent circuit is represented by a generalized finite Warburg element. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the works by Pyun et al, several other research groups [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] have discussed independently their CTs in terms of internal cell resistance. They focused on the determination of the diffusion coefficient of lithium in such electrochromic materials as and Nagai et al 50,54 tried to estimate the diffusion coefficient of lithium inside the film electrode during the bleaching and coloring processes by means of fitting CTs theoretically calculated using simplified electrode potential curves to their experimental CTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Li et al [56][57][58] derived the current-time relation assuming an one-dimensional (linear) electrode potential curve to estimate the diffusion coefficient of lithium from rough comparison of the calculated CTs at various values of parameters with the experimental CTs. Finally, Honder et al [51][52][53]55 calculated the values of diffusion coefficient and total cell resistance from a combination of the approximate equations in the short time and long time ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%