2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounded-error target localization and tracking in presence of decoys using a fleet of UAVs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Issues related to false detection and misidentification of false targets, as well as potential non-identification of true targets are considered. The distinction between true and false targets relies on some deterministic observation conditions generalizing that introduced in [17,18]. The distributed MPC approach introduced here accounts for limited and possibly delayed communications between UAVs, extending previous results in [17,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Issues related to false detection and misidentification of false targets, as well as potential non-identification of true targets are considered. The distinction between true and false targets relies on some deterministic observation conditions generalizing that introduced in [17,18]. The distributed MPC approach introduced here accounts for limited and possibly delayed communications between UAVs, extending previous results in [17,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The distinction between true and false targets relies on some deterministic observation conditions generalizing that introduced in [17,18]. The distributed MPC approach introduced here accounts for limited and possibly delayed communications between UAVs, extending previous results in [17,29]. Finally, a better management of set estimates leads to a more efficient and computationally less demanding control law design compared to that of [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations