2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-004-0759-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounded trace C*-algebras and integrable actions

Abstract: Let G be a second countable group, A be a separable C * -algebra with bounded trace and α a strongly continuous action of G on A. Suppose that the action of G on A induced by α is free and the G-orbits are locally closed. We show that the crossed product A × α G has bounded trace if and only if G acts integrably (in the sense of Rieffel and an Huef) on A. In the course of this, we show that the extent of non-properness of an integrable action gives rise to a lower bound for the size of the (finite) upper multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident from [1,2] that integrability and k-times convergence in the orbit space of a transformation group are closely related. Moreover, Lemma 2.6 of [8] says that, if a principal groupoid fails to be proper and the orbit space G 0 /G is Hausdorff, then there exists a sequence that converges 2-times in G 0 /G in the sense of Definition 3.6.…”
Section: Lemma 35 Let G Be a Locally Compact Hausdorff Groupoid Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is evident from [1,2] that integrability and k-times convergence in the orbit space of a transformation group are closely related. Moreover, Lemma 2.6 of [8] says that, if a principal groupoid fails to be proper and the orbit space G 0 /G is Hausdorff, then there exists a sequence that converges 2-times in G 0 /G in the sense of Definition 3.6.…”
Section: Lemma 35 Let G Be a Locally Compact Hausdorff Groupoid Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Condition (2) in Definition 3.6 is needed so that the composition in (3) makes sense. (b) Definition 3.6 does not require that x n → z, but as in the transformationgroup case ([2, Definition 2.2]), this can be arranged by changing the sequence which converges k-times: replace x n by r(γ (1) n ) and replace γ …”
Section: Lemma 35 Let G Be a Locally Compact Hausdorff Groupoid Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations