1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0396(91)90118-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundedness and blow up for a semilinear reaction-diffusion system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
218
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the nonexistence condition given by Theorem 2.4 coincides with the condition found by Escobedo and Herrero in [2], for the system of equations with positive initial data, that is,…”
Section: Gabriella Caristi 269supporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…and the nonexistence condition given by Theorem 2.4 coincides with the condition found by Escobedo and Herrero in [2], for the system of equations with positive initial data, that is,…”
Section: Gabriella Caristi 269supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The main result of this section (Theorem 2.4) recovers the result obtained in [7] for the single inequality, that is, when τ 1 = τ 2 and p = q. Moreover, Theorem 2.4 includes as a particular case the result by Escobedo and Herrero [2], which concerns the system of equations under the assumptions that τ 1 = τ 2 = 0 and u 0 , v 0 ≥ 0.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, Suzuki [14] considered the Newtonian filtration equation with similar gradient term and got the critical Fujita exponent for some special cases. In 1991, Escobedo and Herrero [2] investigated the coupled semilinear parabolic system (1.1), (1.2), (1.3) in the special case b ≡ 0, and formulated the critical Fujita curve as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System (1.1) has been analyzed by several authors in the case of bounded and unbounded domains (cf. [7], [8], [5], [4], [3], etc.). In particular, it has been shown in [3] that problem (1.1), (1.2) always has a classical solution in some strip ST = [0, T) x R with 0 < T < oo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%