2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundedness and unboundedness results for some maximal operators on functions of bounded variation

Abstract: We characterize the space BV(I ) of functions of bounded variation on an arbitrary interval I ⊂ R, in terms of a uniform boundedness condition satisfied by the local uncentered maximal operator M R from BV(I ) into the Sobolev space W 1,1 (I ). By restriction, the corresponding characterization holds for W 1,1 (I ). We also show that if U is open in R d , d > 1, then boundedness from BV(U ) into W 1,1 (U ) fails for the local directional maximal operator M v T , the local strong maximal operator M S T , and th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from [2,39] that if f ∈ W 1,1 (R), then Mf is absolutely continuous on R and it holds that ( Mf ) ′ L 1 (R) ≤ f ′ L 1 (R) . For d ≥ 1, Aldaz and Pérez Lázaro [3] considered a class of local strong maximal operator and proved that it maps BV(U ) into L 1 (U ), where U is an open set of R d and BV(U ) is a subclass of L 1 (U ) functions. See [19,Definition 1.3] and [4,Definition 3.4] for instance.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from [2,39] that if f ∈ W 1,1 (R), then Mf is absolutely continuous on R and it holds that ( Mf ) ′ L 1 (R) ≤ f ′ L 1 (R) . For d ≥ 1, Aldaz and Pérez Lázaro [3] considered a class of local strong maximal operator and proved that it maps BV(U ) into L 1 (U ), where U is an open set of R d and BV(U ) is a subclass of L 1 (U ) functions. See [19,Definition 1.3] and [4,Definition 3.4] for instance.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge there are no known higher dimensional results in the case p = 1, and even in the one dimensional case it is still not known whether the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function (i.e. the centered one) of f ∈ W 1,1 (R) belongs locally to W 1,1 (R); see, however, [2], [3]. The results proved in the paper are clearly motivated by this challenging problem.…”
Section: B(xr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us also mention that the result of Kinnunen [10] has been applied and generalized by many authors ( [2], [3], [6], [7], [8], [11], [12], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [20], [21], [25]). …”
Section: B(xr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other related results, see also e.g. [2,4,5,6,12]. For results considering other concepts than the weak differentiability, see [7,14].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%