1988
DOI: 10.1109/43.3132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds and analysis of aliasing errors in linear feedback shift registers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear Feedback Shift Register (LFSR) is one of the commonly used in stream cipher technologies, whose feedback function is a simple XOR of certain bits in the register [10]. An n-bit LFSR can generate 2^n-1 bit long pseudo-random sequence before repeating.…”
Section: A Algorithm Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear Feedback Shift Register (LFSR) is one of the commonly used in stream cipher technologies, whose feedback function is a simple XOR of certain bits in the register [10]. An n-bit LFSR can generate 2^n-1 bit long pseudo-random sequence before repeating.…”
Section: A Algorithm Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…however, many approaches have been suggested to analyze and improve the basic signature analysis schemes. The use of primitive polynomials in SA with some restrictions 7,15,17,[20][21][22] along with obtaining multiple signatures with the use of different feedback connections in LFSRs of PRTSG as well as of SA 1,[3][4][5]18,19 can prove a better solution for minimizing the fault-masks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…however, these schemes usually give a number that is only an estimate and sometimes too large. To overcome these problems, a 'divide-and-conquer' approach for testing of large sizes of circuits has been proposed [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . The philosophy behind the divide-and-conquer approach of testing is to apply either the exhaustive test-stimuli or maximal length PRTSs to the different segmented units of the Digital Circuit Under Test (DCUT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be thought as a model of the "expected behavior" of the CUT, over all possible t,est, sequences. Wit,li such a model, single-output faiilt8y circuit,s can be cl~aract~er-ized by a single proba.bility p of an error occurring at the primary output [2,5]. The occurreiice of aliasing errors is measurecl by the aliasing error probabi1it.y (.4EP), a fuiictioii of the test length, the input error probability p , and the feedback polynomial of the register.…”
Section: Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second criterion, proposed first, by Williams et al [2], consists of looking a t the eigeiivalues of the hlarkov chain that describes the probabilistic behavior of the register. The rationale behind this criterion is as follows.…”
Section: Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%