2002
DOI: 10.1049/ip-com:20020315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds for finite block-length codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L and σ p , the FERs of the decoder are monitored in a SNR region from 1dB to 4.5dB. The best overall FER performance is found by LDPC(192, figure 3, in which comparisons are made for the corresponding results in IEEE 802.16e and the sphere-packing bound, which is calculated according to [16] . In the simulation, the maximum iteration number of LDPC It can be observed in figure 4 that the average iterations decrease as the SNR increases.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L and σ p , the FERs of the decoder are monitored in a SNR region from 1dB to 4.5dB. The best overall FER performance is found by LDPC(192, figure 3, in which comparisons are made for the corresponding results in IEEE 802.16e and the sphere-packing bound, which is calculated according to [16] . In the simulation, the maximum iteration number of LDPC It can be observed in figure 4 that the average iterations decrease as the SNR increases.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%