Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1288107.1288142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds for the capacity of wireless multihop networks imposed by topology and demand

Abstract: Existing work on the capacity of wireless networks predominantly considers homogeneous random networks with random work load. The most relevant bounds on the network capacity, e.g., take into account only the number of nodes and the area of the network. However, these bounds can significantly overestimate the achievable capacity in real world situations where network topology or traffic patterns often deviate from these simplistic assumptions. To provide analytically tractable yet asymptotically tight approxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(67 reference statements)
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Assumption 3, SaN is indeed dense scaling [6], [14], [15], [21], [22], while PhN is an extended network [4], [5], [12], [23]- [25]. More discussions about two types of scaling networks can be found in Section II-B of our technical report [26].…”
Section: A Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Assumption 3, SaN is indeed dense scaling [6], [14], [15], [21], [22], while PhN is an extended network [4], [5], [12], [23]- [25]. More discussions about two types of scaling networks can be found in Section II-B of our technical report [26].…”
Section: A Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, we can use such upper bounds as that for SaN whatever strategy is adopted by PhN, because under Gaussian channel model PhN and SaN always have negative influence (interference) on each other under the noncooperative communication scheme as long as they share the same spectrum at the same time. To compute such upper bounds, we exploit the homogeneity property and randomness property of network topology, [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former model is simpler, thus more convenient for the analysis for many issues, besides capacity, of wireless networks, such as localization [23], [24], coverage [25], and lifetime [26] problems in wireless sensor networks. Gaussian Channel model captures better the nature of wireless medium, [3], [27].…”
Section: Literature Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], such threshold of n d was improved to n d = O( n (log n) α+1 ), and the corresponding upper bounds were proposed. KeshavarzHaddad et al [27] proposed a technique called arena to study upper bounds of capacity. They [31] devised a scheme and computed the achievable throughput for random dense networks.…”
Section: Under Gaussian Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keshavarz-Haddad et al [5] introduced the concept of transmission arena. Based on that definition, they presented a method to compute the upper bound of the capacity for different traffic patterns and different topologies of the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%