2013
DOI: 10.1186/1029-242x-2013-281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds for the second Hankel determinant of certain univalent functions

Abstract: The estimates for the second Hankel determinant a 2 a 4 -a 2 3 of the analytic function f (z) = z + a 2 z 2 + a 3 z 3 + · · · , for which either zf (z)/f (z) or 1 + zf (z)/f (z) is subordinate to a certain analytic function, are investigated. The estimates for the Hankel determinant for two other classes are also obtained. In particular, the estimates for the Hankel determinant of strongly starlike, parabolic starlike and lemniscate starlike functions are obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
109
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They got the bounds: 1, 1/8 and 4/9, respectively. For the class S * (ϕ) of Ma-Minda starlike functions, the exact bound of the second Hankel determinant was obtained by Lee et al [5]. The proof of the result |H 2 (2)| ≤ 1 for the class C of close-to-convex functions can be found in the paper [15] by Selvaraj and Kumar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They got the bounds: 1, 1/8 and 4/9, respectively. For the class S * (ϕ) of Ma-Minda starlike functions, the exact bound of the second Hankel determinant was obtained by Lee et al [5]. The proof of the result |H 2 (2)| ≤ 1 for the class C of close-to-convex functions can be found in the paper [15] by Selvaraj and Kumar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The investigation of Hankel determinants for analytic functions was started by Pommerenke (see [11,12]). Following Pommerenke, many mathematicians published their results concerning the second Hankel determinant for various classes of univalent functions (see, for example, [2,3,5,8,10]) or multivalent functions (see [9]). The bounds of a 2 a 4 −a 3 2 for typically real functions were presented in [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…... P P, pw P ∆q. Now, equating the coefficients in (14) and (15) Now from (16) and (19) we get c 1 "´d 1 (22) and…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%