2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2013.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds on end-to-end statistical delay and jitter in multiple multicast coded packet networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Networks were generated randomly such that there was a link from the node i to the node j with a probability of 0.4. The nominal cost on each link was generated according to an uniform distribution on the interval [2,8]. The source node and the receivers were chosen randomly and uniformly among all of the nodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Networks were generated randomly such that there was a link from the node i to the node j with a probability of 0.4. The nominal cost on each link was generated according to an uniform distribution on the interval [2,8]. The source node and the receivers were chosen randomly and uniformly among all of the nodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They formulated the problem as a mixed integer linear programming problem and developed an algorithm based on Benders decomposition. The problem of providing the statistical quality of service guarantees over coded packet networks was studied in [8] which proposed a path-based formulation for the problem. However, in many realistic cases, an accurate estimate for the cost per unit rate of sending coded packets over links may be unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we compared the performance of our algorithm with the End‐to‐end statistical delay and jitter (ESDJ) algorithm proposed by Raayatpanah et al , that established subgraphs over coded packet networks and guaranteed the QoS requirements of end‐to‐end delay and jitter constraints from a source node to receiver nodes. In order to compute between the two algorithms, we should consider a single session multicast, that is, | M |=1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, current multicast algorithms over coded packet networks are no longer adequate in such applications. One way to avoid breaks in the continuity of services is to provide budget constraints based on QoS parameters while keeping the overall cost of the solution low . A similar problem for routing multicast without using network coding is called a constrained Steiner tree, which was studied in several works .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NC can save bandwidth and increase network throughput, it does not consider the Quality of Service (QoS) of multicast routing directly. In order to meet the QoS requirements of end-to-end delay and jitter from source to destination nodes, Raayatpanah et al (2014) attempted to minimize network cost and the number of multicast sessions, by decomposing the NP-hard problem into master problem and sub-problems through feasible path generation. However, these works mainly focused on the single-channel and single-radio scenario.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%