2013
DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2012.704174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bourdieu and Social Movements: Considering Identity Movements in Terms of Field, Capital and Habitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It enables an understanding of how various groups within a movement relate -for instance, the divisions between the so-called 'radical' and moderate groups (Ibrahim, 2013). Field theory also enables us to recognise the importance of symbolic contestation and recognition for social movements (Husu, 2012). Each field has its own definitions of what is at stake within the field -field illusio -and these definitions matter.…”
Section: Applying Field Theory To Social Movementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It enables an understanding of how various groups within a movement relate -for instance, the divisions between the so-called 'radical' and moderate groups (Ibrahim, 2013). Field theory also enables us to recognise the importance of symbolic contestation and recognition for social movements (Husu, 2012). Each field has its own definitions of what is at stake within the field -field illusio -and these definitions matter.…”
Section: Applying Field Theory To Social Movementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In recent years, there has been an upsurge of interest in integrating the work of Pierre Bourdieu and more generally field theory into social movement studies (Fligstein & McAdam, 2012;Husu, 2012;Ibrahim, 2013;Mayrl, 2013). Field theory views social life as taking place within well-defined fields of practice, each with its own form of field capital which participants in the field struggle over.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Economic capital means money and ownership. Cultural capital, which many highlight as central to politics (Bourdieu 1986a;Husu 2013;Mihai 2016;Swartz 2013: 9), refers to individuals' cultural resources that can be incorporated (for example: taste; and abstract understanding and thinking), objectified (cultural goods owned by an individual) and institutionalised (such as educational qualifications) (Bourdieu 1986b). Social capital -the important networks that individuals have and of which they can take advantage in order to gain other capital − is central to political participation and social movements (Diani 1997;Morales and Giugni 2011).…”
Section: Concept Of Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural capital includes knowledge, skills, lifestyle, qualifications, etc. There are three forms of cultural capital: physical (taste and lifestyle, for example),objectified (cultural goods own by an agent) and institutionalized(for instance, educational qualifications) (Husu, 2012). Social capital depends on the size and number of social networks in the field, and network members can benefit from network links.…”
Section: Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%