2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00137_3.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bourdieu Hits Brussels: The Genesis and Structure of the European Field of Power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cohen 2007;Dezalay and Garth 1996;2002;Georgakakis 2009;Georgakakis and Weisbein 2010; articles in different special journal issues such as Retfaerd -Nordic Journal of Law and Justice 2006;Law and Social Inquiry 2007;International Political Sociology 2011). While these studies make implicit or explicit reference to Bourdieu's writings on the state and his conception on the field of power, this analytical framework is seldom made explicit (Cohen 2011). For this reason, we find it worth clarifying the guiding principles in those of his state writings that have provided a 'starting-point' for these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cohen 2007;Dezalay and Garth 1996;2002;Georgakakis 2009;Georgakakis and Weisbein 2010; articles in different special journal issues such as Retfaerd -Nordic Journal of Law and Justice 2006;Law and Social Inquiry 2007;International Political Sociology 2011). While these studies make implicit or explicit reference to Bourdieu's writings on the state and his conception on the field of power, this analytical framework is seldom made explicit (Cohen 2011). For this reason, we find it worth clarifying the guiding principles in those of his state writings that have provided a 'starting-point' for these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The study does not support a narrow delimitation of the field, which only includes organisations that are recognised by the EU or which have their offices in Brussels (cf. Cohen, 2011). Such a narrow delimitation makes it doubtful whether the field has any autonomy at all from the Commission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before this book, there were at least five different uses of field theory in European Studies, whether they focus on global integration theory (Fligstein and McAdam, 2012), transnational public policy field (Bigo, 2007), weak fields built in transnational networks of professionals (Vauchez, 2008;Vauchez and de Witte, 2013), an ongoing field of Power (Cohen, 2011;Kauppi and Madsen, 2013), EU milieus, staff and professionals as a political field (Kauppi, 2005) or as a bureaucratic field (Georgakakis, 2013). Among these different studies inspired or coming from field theory, it seems relevant to bridge the contribution of this book to a broader picture of the EU as a bureaucratic field since there are clear points of comparison and links to build.…”
Section: From the Bureaucratic Field To The Field Of Eurocracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…struggled over the very definition of the institutional framework (and therefore dominant capitals) of this yet loosely defined transnational space (Cohen 2011). These struggles finally resulted in a complex structure of differentiated but intertwined international organizations-the Western European Union (WEU), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Council of Europe (CoE), the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), and the European Economic Community (EEC)-institutionalizing an international division of labor that was not originally intended as such by anyone.…”
Section: The Elites Of the Emergent European Field Of Powermentioning
confidence: 99%