2009
DOI: 10.1177/1558689809336660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bourdieu’s Reflexive Sociology as a Theoretical Basis for Mixed Methods Research

Abstract: Although mixing quantitative and qualitative methods is increasingly popular, there is insufficient theoretical rationale for doing so. Foremost among the legacy left to the social and behavioral sciences by French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu stands his emphasis on methodological reflexivity. Reflexive sociology as elaborated by Bourdieu is a self-referential methodology of social research, which turns methods of constructing the research object back on themselves so as to produce more accurate understanding o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…‘Pseudoscience’ and ‘nonsense’ were other common terms used in reports discussing specific modalities of CAM, as well as referring to CAM as the umbrella term for a whole swathe of undesirable practices and products. Because CAM therapies and products are so diverse, it is problematic to use this umbrella term to make generalisations about the legitimacy or efficacy of such a vast range of often paradigmatically different therapies (Broom and Tovey , Brosnan , Coulter and Willis , Derkatch , Doel and Segrott ,b, Fries 2008b, , Gale , Lewis 2011a, Wardle , Willis and White ). This ambiguity in what Fries (2008b) has referred to as the homogenisation of CAM enables the story to carry wider appeal to news audiences (Johnson‐Cartee ) and, as Wardle () argues, constructs CAM as ‘a dumping ground for therapies and practices that have little in common, meaning that well‐established therapies with good evidence of efficacy and safety are lumped in with whatever newly developed alternative health fad is being promoted on the internet’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘Pseudoscience’ and ‘nonsense’ were other common terms used in reports discussing specific modalities of CAM, as well as referring to CAM as the umbrella term for a whole swathe of undesirable practices and products. Because CAM therapies and products are so diverse, it is problematic to use this umbrella term to make generalisations about the legitimacy or efficacy of such a vast range of often paradigmatically different therapies (Broom and Tovey , Brosnan , Coulter and Willis , Derkatch , Doel and Segrott ,b, Fries 2008b, , Gale , Lewis 2011a, Wardle , Willis and White ). This ambiguity in what Fries (2008b) has referred to as the homogenisation of CAM enables the story to carry wider appeal to news audiences (Johnson‐Cartee ) and, as Wardle () argues, constructs CAM as ‘a dumping ground for therapies and practices that have little in common, meaning that well‐established therapies with good evidence of efficacy and safety are lumped in with whatever newly developed alternative health fad is being promoted on the internet’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason can be explained by the continuing dominance of medical disciplines in this research domain, which largely rely on quantitative study approaches (e.g. Barrett et al 2008 ;Fries 2009 ) .…”
Section: Qualitative Drugs Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research question warrants the use of mixed methods (Fries, 2009). Intellectual triangulation is employed to grasp the totality of a phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%