2015
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine Genome Database: new tools for gleaning function from theBos taurusgenome

Abstract: We report an update of the Bovine Genome Database (BGD) (http://BovineGenome.org). The goal of BGD is to support bovine genomics research by providing genome annotation and data mining tools. We have developed new genome and annotation browsers using JBrowse and WebApollo for two Bos taurus genome assemblies, the reference genome assembly (UMD3.1.1) and the alternate genome assembly (Btau_4.6.1). Annotation tools have been customized to highlight priority genes for annotation, and to aid annotators in selectin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For exosomal RNAs, 91.8% to 99.4% of the mates had no hits to the database and only a few had a hit with two or less mismatches (Table S1). Next, all back-splicing mates were mapped to the bovine genome34 both linearly and using the back-splicing detection algorithm. The linear mapping percentages were close to 0 for all samples, and no more than 2.2% of the back-splicing mates could be back-splicing-mapped to the bovine genome (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For exosomal RNAs, 91.8% to 99.4% of the mates had no hits to the database and only a few had a hit with two or less mismatches (Table S1). Next, all back-splicing mates were mapped to the bovine genome34 both linearly and using the back-splicing detection algorithm. The linear mapping percentages were close to 0 for all samples, and no more than 2.2% of the back-splicing mates could be back-splicing-mapped to the bovine genome (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All back-splicing mates were blasted48 (ncbi-blast-2.3.0+) against the database with default parameters. Next, back-splicing mates were linearly mapped to the bovine genome34 by Tophat2 (version 2.0.12) with up to 2 mismatches49. Moreover, these mates were mapped to the bovine genome using the back-splicing detection algorithm described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw sequencing data (publicly available on the GEO database accession GSE83509, [27]) were analysed using the sRNAbench 1.0 tool [28, 29]. Briefly, the software was run in genome mode using default settings, with the bovine genome (bosTau4) and miRBase 21 (accessed on 30 April 2015) [30, 31] as reference in order to identify bovine miRNAs (bta-miR) and human miRNA homologues (hsa-miR). A single nucleotide mismatch was allowed when mapping raw reads to known miRNA sequences and reads without sequencing adaptor, with undetermined bases and reads below 15 nucleotides (nt) in length being automatically removed from the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Candidate genes identified from SNP concordance analyses, GWAS, and homozygosity mapping were uploaded to the BovineMine warehouse47 to compare the list of candidate genes with the list of bovine genes associated with the GO term “hindlimb morphogenesis” (GO: 0035137). Network analyses were performed on the set of candidate genes associated with the GO term “hindlimb morphogenesis” and all candidate genes identified from GWAS using GeneMANIA48.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%