1995
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1995.9694537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine respiratory syncytial virus reinfections and decreased milk yield in dairy cattle

Abstract: (BRSV) reinfections on the daily milk yield was studied by evaluating the milk production of 32 BRSV reinfected cows. For the estimation of milk production losses, four lactation curve models were used, including a gamma function, a second degree polynomial, and both of these models with a lag variable. Bovine respiratory syncytial virus reinfections seemed to have only a small effect on the daily milk production. Comparison of the true production with an estimated production according to the gamma function sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in accordance in direction with those reported by Norström et al (2001) in case of a declared outbreak, but the magnitude of the decrease observed here (on average, a 0.9 kg/d reduction over a 7-mo period) was much higher than that in the latter study (0.7 kg/d over a 1-wk period). However, Norström et al (2001) hypothesized that their result could be largely underestimated; their estimate was similar to the one reported by Van der Poel et al (1995) in case of BRSV reinfections. Information about the relative proportion of primary infected and reinfected cows (assumed to be severely affected and to have a smaller loss in milk yield, respectively) in the affected herds was lacking in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…These results are in accordance in direction with those reported by Norström et al (2001) in case of a declared outbreak, but the magnitude of the decrease observed here (on average, a 0.9 kg/d reduction over a 7-mo period) was much higher than that in the latter study (0.7 kg/d over a 1-wk period). However, Norström et al (2001) hypothesized that their result could be largely underestimated; their estimate was similar to the one reported by Van der Poel et al (1995) in case of BRSV reinfections. Information about the relative proportion of primary infected and reinfected cows (assumed to be severely affected and to have a smaller loss in milk yield, respectively) in the affected herds was lacking in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Bovine coronavirus (BCV) and bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) infections are widespread, resulting in a high seroprevalence in cattle herds (Van der Poel et al, 1995;Saif, 2004). Bovine coronavirus is an enveloped, positive-stranded RNA virus classified as an antigenic group II member of the family Coronaviridae (Spaan et al, 1988) and is implicated in both respiratory and enteric disease, including calf diarrhoea, winter dysentery in adult dairy cows, and respiratory infections in cattle of all ages (Alenius et al, 1991;Saif, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large scale epidemiological studies from data records investigating production losses and economic impact of bovine respiratory disease are usually based on clinical diagnosis, without specific information about the etiological agent [1,2,4]. For BRSV specifically, reduced milk yield [5,20] and reduced semen quality [21] are amongst the reported effects. Studies on negative consequences of this infection, relevant for rearing of young stock, are scarce and represent an important knowledge gap in the estimation of the total consequences of BRSV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%