2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine tuberculosis as a model for human tuberculosis: advantages over small animal models

Abstract: For the development of vaccines and treatments against tuberculosis, animal models are needed. In this review, the pathogenesis and immune responses during human and bovine tuberculosis will be compared. Special attention will be paid to latency, because this feature has recently become the basis of specialized vaccines against latency antigens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bovine TB parallels human TB in several aspects of disease pathogenesis and the development of innate and adaptive immune responses (3,4). In particular, the M. bovis-specific gd T cell response is uniquely similar to that described in human TB patients (3,4). Thus, the study of virulent M. bovis infection in cattle both increases our understanding of the bovine immune response to TB and represents an excellent model for understanding M. tuberculosis infection in humans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Bovine TB parallels human TB in several aspects of disease pathogenesis and the development of innate and adaptive immune responses (3,4). In particular, the M. bovis-specific gd T cell response is uniquely similar to that described in human TB patients (3,4). Thus, the study of virulent M. bovis infection in cattle both increases our understanding of the bovine immune response to TB and represents an excellent model for understanding M. tuberculosis infection in humans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This classification acknowledges the existence of one type, the focal type, that would represent an infectious state similar to that of latency that is considered the most frequent in human tuberculosis (Flynn & Chan, 2001;Corbett et al, 2003), but that has not been well def ined in cattle mycobacteriosis (Cassidy, 2006;Van Rhijn et al, 2008). Indeed, other terms representing that concept but with a broader and more epidemiological perspective, have been defined by Nielsen & Toft (2008) as: free of infection, infected (non-shedders), infectious (MAP shedders) and affected (clinical PTB and MAP shedding).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycobacterial infections of cattle provide good models for human tuberculosis (13)(14)(15). Cattle are within the natural host range of several pathogenic mycobacteria (M. bovis, M. tuberculosis, and M. avium subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%