2014
DOI: 10.1159/000362213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bowel Dysfunction following Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Study

Abstract: Objective: To objectively assess anorectal dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in stage I-II cervical carcinoma patients. Material and Methods: Between 2008 and 2012, 21 patients with primary cervical cancer stage FIGO I-II were enrolled in this prospective study. All women underwent nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Anorectal manometry was performed preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. A paired Student t test was used to assess the statistical difference between the manometric eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…observed in their study that resting and squeeze sphincter pressures, volume of saline infused at first leak, total volume retained, and threshold volume for maximum tolerable volume are all decreased significantly after hysterectomy for cervical cancer14. However, in more recent work of Loizzi et.al., it was found that maximal and mean anal resting and squeezing pressures were unaffected by the surgical procedure, rectoanal inhibitory reflex and length of the high anal pressure zone did not change when a nerve sparing technique was used15. In our study, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups both in abdominal hysterectomy group and in vaginal hysterectomy group in terms of the manometry results before and after the operation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…observed in their study that resting and squeeze sphincter pressures, volume of saline infused at first leak, total volume retained, and threshold volume for maximum tolerable volume are all decreased significantly after hysterectomy for cervical cancer14. However, in more recent work of Loizzi et.al., it was found that maximal and mean anal resting and squeezing pressures were unaffected by the surgical procedure, rectoanal inhibitory reflex and length of the high anal pressure zone did not change when a nerve sparing technique was used15. In our study, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups both in abdominal hysterectomy group and in vaginal hysterectomy group in terms of the manometry results before and after the operation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Importantly, 55 % of women continued to report functional diffi culties as late as 18 months, including constipation and the onset of fecal incontinence. To opposite manometric fi ndings came Loizzi et al [ 48 ] investigating 21 women 6 months after nerve-sparing RH: no changes from baseline were observed after surgery in any of the tested parameters, including rectal compliance.…”
Section: Anorectal Dysfunctionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Due to the morbidity of parametrectomy, some services are developing an autonomic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy, both minimally invasive and by laparotomy, in order to decrease the nervous sequelae in the vagina, bladder and rectum. A recent study has shown that this technique is associated to lower anorectal dysfunction 26 . Another long-term study showed that laparoscopy for radical hysterectomy improves nervous dissection and preservation due to the better magnification 27 .…”
Section: Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy Lamentioning
confidence: 98%