2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boys will still be boys: Gender differences in trading activity are not due to differences in (over)confidence

Abstract: The fact that men trade more than women in financial markets has been attributed to men's overconfidence. However, evidence supporting this view is only indirect. We directly test this conjecture experimentally, by measuring confidence using monetary incentives before participants trade in a simulated market. We find that men are more confident than women in our trading task. Men also trade more, and they hold larger and less diversified portfolios than women. However, we do not find that differences in confid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no evidence of differences in gender and trading activity (Biais et al, 2005;Cueva et al, 2019;Deaves et al, 2009;Fellner-Röhling & Krügel, 2014). These findings are inconsistent with those of Barber and Odean (2001) and Kumar and Goyal (2016).…”
Section: Impacts Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no evidence of differences in gender and trading activity (Biais et al, 2005;Cueva et al, 2019;Deaves et al, 2009;Fellner-Röhling & Krügel, 2014). These findings are inconsistent with those of Barber and Odean (2001) and Kumar and Goyal (2016).…”
Section: Impacts Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Variable asymmetric information has been studied previously (Biais et al, 2005;Cueva et al, 2019;Deaves et al, 2009;Fellner-Röhling & Krügel, 2014). Interestingly, Yang and…”
Section: Impacts Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such biases often begin at an early age (Rudeloff et al, 2019) and tend to link women to the practice of savings while excluding them from economic discussions (Yu et al, 2015). This is in contrast to the way in which men are taught from a young age to trust in their economic abilities and are actively included in financial discussions (Al-Bahrani et al, 2020;Bannier & Schwarz, 2018;Cueva et al, 2019;Lind et al, 2020). There is substantial evidence in this regard that shows how the processes of financial literacy are differentiated by gender (Fonseca et al, 2012;Lulup Tripalupi et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Financial Inclusion Of Women and The Financial Education...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we included the selfassessed general "willingness to take risks" measure of risk and used this "erratic" measure as a control in the regression. For simplicity and consistency with the other psychological measures, we also only included the selfassessed general measure of confidence and not the group ranking forecasts, although results do not change if the latter measure is used instead (these forecasts are reported and used in Cueva et al 2019).…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prominent explanation of why individual investors actively trade in financial markets with significant transaction costs is that they are overconfident(Barber and Odean, 2000;2001).5 The analysis of (gender effects in) trade volume for this experiment is discussed in detail inCueva et al (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%