2015
DOI: 10.12659/pjr.893358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brachiocephalic Vein Stenting and Body-Floss Technique as a Treatment of CVD in Dialysis-Dependent Patient – Case Report and Literature Review

Abstract: SummaryBackgroundGiven the increasing number of elderly hemodialysis-dependent patients with concomitant chronic diseases the successful creation and maintenance of reliable vascular access become a real challenge. In current literature central vein disease (CVD) is defined as at least 50% narrowing up to total occlusion of central veins of the thorax including superior vena cava (SVC), brachiocephalic (BCV), subclavian (SCV) and internal jugular vein (IJV). The incidence of CVD has been reported to be as high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reported technical success rates, complications, and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy varied greatly [1, 6, 9–14], which can be attributed to differences in recanalizing technique, study methodologies, patient demography, and certain characteristics of obstructive lesions including size and elasticity, as well as the degree of obstruction [14, 11, 15]. According to reports, technical success rates have been shown to have a range from 70% to 100% [1, 16]. However, we noted that clinical practice guidelines, such as the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) and the European Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG), were developed in 2002–2006 in developed countries [17, 18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reported technical success rates, complications, and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy varied greatly [1, 6, 9–14], which can be attributed to differences in recanalizing technique, study methodologies, patient demography, and certain characteristics of obstructive lesions including size and elasticity, as well as the degree of obstruction [14, 11, 15]. According to reports, technical success rates have been shown to have a range from 70% to 100% [1, 16]. However, we noted that clinical practice guidelines, such as the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) and the European Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG), were developed in 2002–2006 in developed countries [17, 18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The prevalence of central venous stenosis or occlusion is 23% in the total hemodialysis population and up to 41% in those with vascular access-related problems. 3 The most common symptoms in patients with central venous stenosis or occlusion are ipsilateral upper extremity, facial and breast edema, superficial chest wall venous tortuous dilatation, 1 chest tightness, and dyspnea. 4 When patients present with neurological symptoms or signs, differential diagnosis requires consideration of cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, and other cerebrovascular lesions of the arterial system, as well as carotid-cavernous fistula and other disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technical success rates of PTA of CVO could be as high as 70% to 100% [10,11] ; however, there are still patients whose occlusion cannot be traversed using a conventional technique. For long segment CVO, the lesion usually involves more than 1 segment of central veins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%