2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-017-9961-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brachythecium rutabulum, A Neglected Medicinal Moss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We tracked their subsequent synonymic polynomials in early taxonomical works (by Dillen, Linnaeus and Hedwig), which eventually led us to first binomial basonyms and further binomial nomenclature. Such partial results have been already published by us [ 3 , 8 , 23 ]. We queried databases (ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed) for the identified binomials to find data on their chemical compounds and their pharmacology.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We tracked their subsequent synonymic polynomials in early taxonomical works (by Dillen, Linnaeus and Hedwig), which eventually led us to first binomial basonyms and further binomial nomenclature. Such partial results have been already published by us [ 3 , 8 , 23 ]. We queried databases (ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed) for the identified binomials to find data on their chemical compounds and their pharmacology.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…An example is Brachythecium rutabulum (Hedw.) Schimp., which was probably recommended in wound dressing at least between 1651 and 1731 [ 23 ]. It was a common species; a weed in gardens [ 24 ] (p. 444).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, very few parasitoid species are known from those lepidopteran species, partially because host caterpillars usually have an ecological function rather than cause economic losses, and therefore attract very little attention by entomologists; moreover, little is known regarding the trophic relationships and ecological interactions between these phytophagous insects and their host bryophytes (Wang and Luo 2001;Davidson et al 1989). In fact, some species of bryophytes such as Brachythecium rutabulum (Jacek and Adam 2018), Mnium hornum, Trichocoleopsis cacculatta, Chiloscyphus polyanthus, Wiesnerella denudata, Frullania dilatata, F. tamarisci, and Gymnocolea inflata were reported to produce a variety of toxic chemicals which repel caterpillars such as Spodoptera littoralis and Limacodidae (Asakawa 1990a(Asakawa , 1990b(Asakawa , 1994Davidson et al 1989;Shang and Yan 2014). Some other caterpillars found in these relatively ancient habitats have a long co-evolving interaction between insects and lower host bryophytes (Ren et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to this feature, it suits the performed research well. The absorption capacity of dry B. rutabulum is 16.1:1, meaning that the dried plants can absorb an average of 20 g of water with dissolved substances per 1 g of herb [63]. For comparison, this amount is about 75% of the value the cushions of the genus Sphagnum (who are record holders in this respect) can absorbed.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%