2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs61212094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brahan Project High Frequency Radar Ocean Measurements: Currents, Winds, Waves and Their Interactions

Abstract: Abstract:We describe radar measurements of waves, currents and winds made on the coast of northern Scotland during two 2013/14 winter storms, giving methods, results and interpretation. Wave parameters (height, period, direction and short-wave/wind direction) were derived and compared with measurements made by a neighboring buoy and local weather stations. Wind direction and current velocity maps were produced and the interactions of winds and currents discussed. Significant oscillations in wave parameters wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results derived from the best linear fit of scatterplots show that the slope is close to 1, although HFR estimations seem to slightly overestimate Hs field in the Galician region. Since these results are in line with previous literature on HFR-buoy wave height comparisons [7,16,18], we can state that HFR performance is consistent and it can act as a useful ancillary tool, especially when no in situ wave observations are available, as occurred with the B2 buoy during February 2014 (Figure 2b). In this context, specific intercomparisons of Hs have been conducted for the three selected periods, by using in situ measurements (B1 buoy), remote-sensed estimations (SILL HFR site), and modeled data (IBI-WAV) in the closest grid point (Figure 3b,d,f).…”
Section: Preliminary Skill Assessment Of Hf Radar Wave Height Estimatsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The results derived from the best linear fit of scatterplots show that the slope is close to 1, although HFR estimations seem to slightly overestimate Hs field in the Galician region. Since these results are in line with previous literature on HFR-buoy wave height comparisons [7,16,18], we can state that HFR performance is consistent and it can act as a useful ancillary tool, especially when no in situ wave observations are available, as occurred with the B2 buoy during February 2014 (Figure 2b). In this context, specific intercomparisons of Hs have been conducted for the three selected periods, by using in situ measurements (B1 buoy), remote-sensed estimations (SILL HFR site), and modeled data (IBI-WAV) in the closest grid point (Figure 3b,d,f).…”
Section: Preliminary Skill Assessment Of Hf Radar Wave Height Estimatsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Considering the recent progress in HF radar measurement of wind-wave parameters (e.g., [4,5]), we should be able to evaluate the detection probability along the beams for a tsunami scenario in real time in the near future. In addition, we will soon apply the present method for longer-range NJRC HF radars with a center frequency of 13.5 MHz, to be deployed on the southeast coast of Kyushu Island in Miyazaki Prefecture (see Figure 1) and operated from April 2019.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a multiyear analysis of HF radar observations off the US west coast, Kim et al [3] reported continuous surface ocean variability ranging from submesoscale (O(1 km)) to mesoscale (O(1000 km)) and revealed that the spectra decayed with k −2 at high wavenumbers, in agreement with theoretical submesoscale spectra. Lipa et al [4] revealed Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1126 2 of 17 periodic time oscillations in the wave parameters (height, period, direction) forced by semidiurnal tides, which was never observed before HF radar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High frequency radar is typically statically mounted on land and used to measure wave height, period and direction as well as surface water velocity, and to estimate wind speed and direction (Lipa et al, 2014). This is particularly useful since the measurements can cover up to 100 s of km range with temporal resolution of hours, spatial resolutions for different frequency operations range from meters to kilometers (Wyatt, 2006).…”
Section: High-frequency Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%