1972
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3160250205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Braids and riemann surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this continued investigation, we show that if a Riemann surface has genus 1, then an infinite class of non-solvable (and even simple) groups can appear and very few cyclic and non-cyclic Abelian groups can appear. When the genus is >1, our results are related to the above stated results in the following way: A necessary and sufficient condition for a covering to be Galois is that the order of the monodromy group be equal to n (the number of sheets) [16]. Thus, in this instance, the monodromy group must necessarily be represented using the right-regular representation.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In this continued investigation, we show that if a Riemann surface has genus 1, then an infinite class of non-solvable (and even simple) groups can appear and very few cyclic and non-cyclic Abelian groups can appear. When the genus is >1, our results are related to the above stated results in the following way: A necessary and sufficient condition for a covering to be Galois is that the order of the monodromy group be equal to n (the number of sheets) [16]. Thus, in this instance, the monodromy group must necessarily be represented using the right-regular representation.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The braid group B r of the plane E 2 is the subgroup of the automorphism group aut(F r ) of F r consisting of those it is enough to describe this last quotient. With the notation in Magnus [11]:…”
Section: The Modular Group Mod(γ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the time dependent piece of the frequency is small in comparison with the constant (average) part, an expansion in powers of the former seems natural. The alternative we follow here, corresponds to writing the (formal) solution to the classical equation of motion in phase space, and implementing the Magnus expansion [7,8,9] to solve the latter. This preserves, order by order, the time evolution as a canonical transformation, both at the classical and quantum levels (since the equations of motion are linear).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%