“…In other studies stronger fMRI response in bilateral pre‐frontal cortex (PFC) including medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), ACC, PCC, superior temporal cortex (STC), middle temporal cortex (MTC) and cuneus, and right occipital cortex and parahippocampus, and weaker fMRI response in bilateral DLPFC, right MPFC, insula, parietal cortex and ventral striatum and left posterior cerebellum, during performance of WM tasks by patients with SZ compared to HC have been reported (Glahn et al, 2005; Meyer‐Lindenberg et al, 2001; Van Snellenberg et al, 2016). In several studies, including a meta‐analysis (Van Snellenberg, Torres, & Thornton, 2006), a region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed specifically for DLPFC and found stronger fMRI response (Karlsgodt et al, 2009; Manoach et al, 2000; Potkin et al, 2009; Van Snellenberg et al, 2016), weaker fMRI response (Fan et al, 2019; Kaminski et al, 2020; Menon, Anagnoson, Mathalon, Glover, & Pfefferbaum, 2001; Pu et al, 2019) or no significant difference in fMRI response (Van Snellenberg et al, 2006) in patients with SZ compared to HC. Additionally, using independent component analysis (ICA), several fMRI studies of WM tasks have revealed significant alterations of fMRI response in patients with SZ relative to HC, which are either correlated or anti‐correlated with WM performance, including stronger fMRI response in bilateral superior frontal gyrus (SFG), PCC, insula, superior temporal gyrus (STG), inferior temporal gyrus, precuneus, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, putamen and cerebellum, left DLPFC, cingulate gyrus and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) (Chatterjee et al, 2019; Kim et al, 2009), and weaker fMRI response in bilateral dentate gyrus and cerebellum (Kim et al, 2009).…”