2002
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Activation Modulated by the Comprehension of Normal and Pseudo-word Sentences of Different Processing Demands: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
151
3
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
22
151
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless several studies, like the present one, have reported effects of syntactic manipulations in BA 45 or 47 (e.g., refs. 22,31,[41][42][43][44]. Most noteworthy is a recent study by Tyler et al (45) where the activations to grammatically coherent sentences without meaning were remarkably similar to those that we report here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless several studies, like the present one, have reported effects of syntactic manipulations in BA 45 or 47 (e.g., refs. 22,31,[41][42][43][44]. Most noteworthy is a recent study by Tyler et al (45) where the activations to grammatically coherent sentences without meaning were remarkably similar to those that we report here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This manipulation drastically reduces lexico-semantic content while keeping syntactic constituent structure intact, allowing to disentangle syntactic constituency effects from semantic co-herence effects (7,(20)(21)(22). It also introduces an important control for transition probabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, IFG activation has been associated with semantic retrieval, lexical decisions, and the generation of semantic categories. Finally, neuroimaging studies have implicated the IFG in syntactic processing (e.g., Friederici et al, 2006;Kaan and Swaab, 2002;Roder et al, 2002). These classic areas are known to be involved in language processing; and, the IFG has been long associated with the semantic, phonological and syntactic aspects of language (e.g., Bedny et al, 2008;Kemeny et al, 2005;Rodd et al, 2010).…”
Section: Receptive and Expressive Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more complex syntactic structures are, the more difficult sentence comprehension generally becomes. Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies tested the effects of object-initial scrambled sentences in German and Hebrew, and reported enhanced activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and posterior superior/middle temporal gyrus (pSTG/MTG) [Ben-Shachar et al, 2004;Bornkessel et al, 2005;Fiebach et al, 2005;Rö der et al, 2002]. It is true that the sentences used in many of these studies make it difficult to know the cause of increased activation, since processing syntactically complex sentences is inevitably confounded by task difficulty, which may simply explain the increased activation, as indicated earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%