2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21113716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) Control of a Virtual Assistant in a Smartphone to Manage Messaging Applications

Abstract: Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) are a type of assistive technology that uses the brain signals of users to establish a communication and control channel between them and an external device. BCI systems may be a suitable tool to restore communication skills in severely motor-disabled patients, as BCI do not rely on muscular control. The loss of communication is one of the most negative consequences reported by such patients. This paper presents a BCI system focused on the control of four mainstream messaging ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
1
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
11
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison with our previous study that followed a similar procedure (i.e., the use of voice commands built using a BCI system for interpretation by a voice assistant to control diverse messaging systems [27]) shows that the accuracy obtained here was slightly lower (80.68 % vs 86.14 %), but the information transfer rate (ITR) was higher (25.9 bits/min vs 21.69bits/min). The ITR is the number of bits transmitted per second and provides a more general evaluation than accuracy since, besides considering it, it takes into account the number of elements available in the interface as well as the time needed for each selection, which depends on the number of sequences used [42].…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A comparison with our previous study that followed a similar procedure (i.e., the use of voice commands built using a BCI system for interpretation by a voice assistant to control diverse messaging systems [27]) shows that the accuracy obtained here was slightly lower (80.68 % vs 86.14 %), but the information transfer rate (ITR) was higher (25.9 bits/min vs 21.69bits/min). The ITR is the number of bits transmitted per second and provides a more general evaluation than accuracy since, besides considering it, it takes into account the number of elements available in the interface as well as the time needed for each selection, which depends on the number of sequences used [42].…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 58%
“…Based on the accuracy of the results obtained with this classifier, the number of sequences was adjusted for each subject. For healthy participants, the criterion applied to choose the number of sequences aimed to maximize the written symbol rate (WSR), as in [27,34,35]. In the same way as in [27], this criterion was adapted so that the minimum number of sequences was three.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…BCIs had been widely developed to allow subjects to control devices or communicate with others by modulating their brain signals [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Generally, the BCIs use near-infrared spectroscopy, functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography, or electroencephalogram (EEG) to monitor a user's brain activities [8][9][10]. Using the EEG as the recording methods has a relatively lower cost [11,12], thus the EEG had been successfully used in BCIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%