2014
DOI: 10.3233/rnn-130361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain control of functional reach in healthy adults and stroke survivors

Abstract: Purpose: Recovery of the most basic shoulder-flexion/elbow-extension components of functional reach is critical for effective arm function following stroke. In order to understand the mechanisms of motor recovery, it is important to characterize the pattern of brain activation during the reach task. Methods: We evaluated 11 controls and 23 moderately to severely impaired chronic stroke survivors (>6 months), with impaired shoulder flexion and elbow extension. Measures were acquired for Arm Motor Ability Test (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In post-stroke fMRI investigations, it has been used to identify neuro plastic alterations in stroke survivors [37]. Further, it was found to be associated with greater activation in the hemisphere contralateral to the working limb (lesioned hemisphere) versus the hemisphere ipsilateral to the working limb (non-lesioned hemisphere) [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In post-stroke fMRI investigations, it has been used to identify neuro plastic alterations in stroke survivors [37]. Further, it was found to be associated with greater activation in the hemisphere contralateral to the working limb (lesioned hemisphere) versus the hemisphere ipsilateral to the working limb (non-lesioned hemisphere) [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One candidate biomarker of motor recovery in stroke is the ratio of activity between the primary motor cortices during movement of one's paretic limb (i.e., motor cortex laterality; M1-LAT). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Marshall et al, 2000;Tombari et al, 2004;Daly et al, 2014), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) (Takeda et al, 2007;Delorme et al, 2017), or electroencephalography (EEG) (Kaiser et al, 2012), it has been shown that deviation from a typical contralateralized pattern of M1-LAT corresponds to worse upper-extremity movement deficits. Moreover, fNIRS studies have also found that the inverse pattern (i.e., a departure from the typically symmetrical pattern of M1-LAT) corresponds to worse gait abilities (Miyai et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%