1999
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199902150-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Death and Its Influence on Donor Organ Quality and Outcome After Transplantation1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
169
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
169
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These processes are believed to be responsible (30) for the divergence in clinical results between kidney allografts from cadaver donors and those from living donors (5). Experimentally, kidneys and hearts transplanted from BD animals show accelerated acute rejection in comparison to grafts from living donors (2). This is thought to be triggered by an increased release of proinflammatory cytokines (2,5,31), an up-regulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC/HLA class I and II) antigens and co-stimulating B7 in peripheral organs (5,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These processes are believed to be responsible (30) for the divergence in clinical results between kidney allografts from cadaver donors and those from living donors (5). Experimentally, kidneys and hearts transplanted from BD animals show accelerated acute rejection in comparison to grafts from living donors (2). This is thought to be triggered by an increased release of proinflammatory cytokines (2,5,31), an up-regulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC/HLA class I and II) antigens and co-stimulating B7 in peripheral organs (5,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation that living donor organs show a better outcome than organs from cadaveric donors (1) cannot be fully attributed to shorter cold ischemia time and better immunological conditions, thus indicating that BD can cause relevant pathopysiological changes. This central catastrophe (2) appears to be a primary injury proceeding the secondary effects of ischemia/reperfusion (3). A combination of these effects leads to enhanced immunogenicity, which, after engraftment, can accelerate the recipient's immune response (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After enormous progress in handling problems concerning immunocompatibility, factors like brain death [2] and ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) [ 3 , 41 are becoming the center of interest of many investigations with the aim to improve outcome after solid-organ transplantation. IRI plays an important role in the development of graft pancreatitis [5], which is still an unsolved problem in pancreas transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherent to graft outcome are donor demographics, hemodynamics, and ischemic times, which vary with the utilization of LDs or cadaveric donors, both whole and segmental. 5 Ultimately, many mitigating factors impact outcomes. Among these, discerning the relative importance of graft type to graft and patient outcome would influence decisions regarding graft selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%