2022
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0334-20.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Dynamics of Action Monitoring in Higher-Order Motor Control Disorders: The Case of Apraxia

Abstract: Authors' contribution: GS and SMA conceived the study. GS, LC and RP performed the experiment and collected the data. GS analysed EEG data. LC analysed neuropsychological and neuroimaging data. ET designed the stimuli and programmed the set-up. All the authors discussed the protocol and the results and contributed to manuscript preparation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, finding a similar oPe in PD 'off', PD 'on' and HCs, is consistent with the notion that generation of this component does not seem to depend on the dopaminergic system (Falkenstein et al, 2001). One may find surprising that we did not find any error-related negativity (oERN), a marker of error detection that was present in previous studies with young adults (Pavone et al, 2016;Pezzetta et al, 2018;Spinelli et al, 2018), but absent with older populations (Spinelli et al, 2022). We speculate that such absence may be related to weak modulation of oERN in aging (Nieuwenhuis et al, 2001;Thurm et al, 2020), or to its low amplitude compared to action execution ERN (van Schie et al, 2004).…”
Section: Dopamine Does Not Modulate the Opesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, finding a similar oPe in PD 'off', PD 'on' and HCs, is consistent with the notion that generation of this component does not seem to depend on the dopaminergic system (Falkenstein et al, 2001). One may find surprising that we did not find any error-related negativity (oERN), a marker of error detection that was present in previous studies with young adults (Pavone et al, 2016;Pezzetta et al, 2018;Spinelli et al, 2018), but absent with older populations (Spinelli et al, 2022). We speculate that such absence may be related to weak modulation of oERN in aging (Nieuwenhuis et al, 2001;Thurm et al, 2020), or to its low amplitude compared to action execution ERN (van Schie et al, 2004).…”
Section: Dopamine Does Not Modulate the Opesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…One may find surprising that we did not find any error-related negativity (oERN), a marker of error detection that was present in previous studies with young adults (Pavone et al, 2016; Pezzetta et al, 2018; Spinelli et al, 2018), but absent with older populations (Spinelli et al, 2022). We speculate that such absence may be related to weak modulation of oERN in aging (Nieuwenhuis et al, 2001; Thurm et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, we did not find any oERN, an error detection marker present in previous studies with young adults 30,31,58 . However, it should be noted that this component was absent in older populations investigated with a paradigm very similar to ours 77 . We speculate that its absence may reflect weak oERN modulation in aged individuals [78][79][80] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The total duration of the movement was 1000 ms. The movement's kinematics were identical for 70% of the action duration in both correct and incorrect conditions but could diverge in the final 30% leading to either a successful or unsuccessful grasping; 30,31,58,77 here a short videoclip of the paradigm: https://osf.io/rxeha). The deviation from the to-be-grasped object was identical in all erroneous trials (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%