Brain dysfunction and criminal violence

Pallone, Nathaniel J.; Hennessy, James J.

doi:10.1007/bf02686049

Cited by 18 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some studies have found history of TBI to be an independent predictor of criminal and violent behaviours, imprisonment and recidivism [10]. Neuropsychological studies indicate that the prevalence of brain dysfunction in offender populations is extremely high, with prevalence rates as high as 94% among homicide offenders [11]. In sexual homicide perpetrators, Briken and colleagues [12] found a high prevalence (30%) of heterogeneous brain abnormalities consistent with previous studies [13] but lower than the rate found by others (e.g., [14]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence and assessment of traumatic brain injury in prison inmates: A systematic PRISMA review

Allely

2016

Brain Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In terms of the implication for further research and practice, the studies identified in this review clearly emphasize the need to account for TBI in managing care in offender populations, which may contribute to reduction in offending behaviours. Additionally, there is a need for further research investigating the clinical utility of screening tools for detecting TBI in offender populations such as The Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire (TBIQ), The Brain Injury Screening Index (BISI) and The Ohio State University (OSU-TBI-ID) TBI Identification method.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence and assessment of traumatic brain injury in prison inmates: A systematic PRISMA review

Allely

2016

Brain Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Federal Bureau of Investigation, in its report on September 6, 2000, based on a 2-year study that examined 18 school shooting cases, concluded that "at this time, there is no research that has identified traits and characteristics that can reliably distinguish school shooters from other students" (Mulvihill & Tumin, 1970; see also Gibbs, 1995). Gladwell (1997) examined the new studies of the brain suggesting that some violent criminals suffer from a combination of child abuse, brain injuries, and psychotic symptoms; and Pallone and Hennessy (1998) argued that social scientists now have to "broaden their paradigms" toward violence to include information from neurosciences because "a biological brain-proneness" toward violence is now widely accepted by neuroscientists. The best recent review of the research in violence causation in the fields of anthropology, behavioral sciences, biology, and psychology can be found in the "Theories of Violence" section of the 1999 encyclopedia, Violence in America (Vol.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 98%

The Historiography of American Violence

Leonard

Leonard²

2003

Homicide Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Historians have generally agreed that the United States has always been an extremely violent nation; however, since the 1950s they have been myopic in their treatment of violence in America and have not provided the American people with essential information about their society and culture. Those historians who focused on violence in America, until the 1990s, have focused on only one form of violence—collective social violence. Largely overlooked, and equally significant, are interpersonal violence (including criminal and domestic violence) and the effect of war. This deficiency helps explain why Americans seem genuinely at a loss to understand the nature, character, and frequency of violence in America’s past and present, especially when a high-profile violent incident occurs. This article surveys the historiography of violence in America through the 1990s and examines the contributions of historians and legal scholars who have focused on interpersonal and criminal violence.

show abstract

“…Fischer ve Fischer, 2004;Ikpe, 2011;Kosic ve Tauber, 2010;Kök, 2007;Ramon, 2004). Pek çok sosyal bilimci, yaşamsal önemi olan sinir bilim bulgularının nispeten makro düzeye entegrasyonu konusunda da gönülsüzdür (Pallone ve Hennesy, 1998). 9 Terapistlerin de kendi uyum bozucu şemaları olabileceğinden ve bunun, terapiyi olumsuz etkileyebileceğinden hareketle Rafaeli, Bernstein ve Young da terapistin terapi görmesini önermektedir.…”

Section: Sonuçunclassified

Siyasi çatışmaların çözümünde şiddetsiz iletişim modelinin olanak ve kısıtlılıkları

Selçuk¹

2017

Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu makalede, Rosenberg"in şiddetsiz iletişim modelinin, etnik gruplar arası siyasi çatışmaların çözümü açısından sunduğu olanak ve kısıtlılıklar çok düzlemli bir çerçeve üzerinden değerlendirilmektedir. Modelin çatışma çözümüne ve insan doğasına dair kabulleri, ruh ve sinir bilim bulgularına göndermede bulunarak irdelenmektedir. Modelin analizinden hareketle, şiddetli çatışmalara yol açma ve barış inşası sürecini tıkama potansiyelleri bakımından farklılaşan bireysel kapasitelerin göz önünde bulundurulmasının önemi vurgulanmaktadır. Travmaların zincirleme etkisinin ve şiddet döngüsünün kırılabilmesi bakımından, çok düzlemli bir çözümleme çerçevesi benimsenmesinin ve mezo ve makro düzlemlerde yer alan teorilerin insan doğasına dair kabullerinin ruh ve sinir bilim bulgularını takip ederek yenilenmesinin faydalı olduğu ortaya konmaktadır.Anahtar Sözcükler: Çatışma Çözümü, Barış İnşası, Şiddetsiz İletişim, Mikro-Makro Bağlantısı, Ruh ve Sinir Bilim Opportunities and Limits of Non-Violent Communication Model in Political Conflict Resolution AbstractThis article examines the opportunities and limits of Rosenberg"s non-violent communication model in ethnic conflict resolution processes through a multi-level analytical framework. The model"s presumptions on human nature and conflict resolution are analyzed with reference to the findings in psychology and neuroscience. Based on this analysis, significance of variation in individual capacities as regards their potential for inciting violent conflicts and hindering peace processes is accentuated. The utility of a multilevel analytical framework and the renewal of the mezzo-and macro-level theories" presumptions on human nature with novel findings in psychology and neuroscience are stressed in order to break the chain of traumas and the circle of violence.

show abstract

Brain dysfunction and criminal violence

Cited by 18 publications

References 0 publications

Prevalence and assessment of traumatic brain injury in prison inmates: A systematic PRISMA review

Prevalence and assessment of traumatic brain injury in prison inmates: A systematic PRISMA review

The Historiography of American Violence

Siyasi çatışmaların çözümünde şiddetsiz iletişim modelinin olanak ve kısıtlılıkları

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About