2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-8994(99)00154-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain dysmaturity index for automatic detection of high-risk infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preferred methodological approach was the fast-Fourier transform analysis, studied initially with fullterm neonates (Eiselt et al, 2001;Field et al, 2002;Ktonas et al, 1995;Lehtonen et al, 1998;Witte et al, 1997), followed by more recent reports in preterm infants (Eisalt et al, 1997;Holthausen et al, 2000;Kuhle et al, 2001;Myers et al, 1997;Sawaguchi et al, 1996;Schramm et al, 2000;Vanhatalo et al, 2002). Similar calculations, based primarily on assumptions of stationarity, were also described for specific neonatal and infant risk groups for sudden infant death syndrome (Schechtman et al, 1995), apnea (Schramm et al, 2000), hyperbilirubinemia (Gurses et al, 2002), white matter necrosis (Inder et al, 2003), and asphyxia (Hellström-Westas, 1992), applying power analyses to one particular physiologic behavior with little attention to the multiple neuronal networks that contemporaneously express state transitions.…”
Section: Automated Neonatal State Detection Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferred methodological approach was the fast-Fourier transform analysis, studied initially with fullterm neonates (Eiselt et al, 2001;Field et al, 2002;Ktonas et al, 1995;Lehtonen et al, 1998;Witte et al, 1997), followed by more recent reports in preterm infants (Eisalt et al, 1997;Holthausen et al, 2000;Kuhle et al, 2001;Myers et al, 1997;Sawaguchi et al, 1996;Schramm et al, 2000;Vanhatalo et al, 2002). Similar calculations, based primarily on assumptions of stationarity, were also described for specific neonatal and infant risk groups for sudden infant death syndrome (Schechtman et al, 1995), apnea (Schramm et al, 2000), hyperbilirubinemia (Gurses et al, 2002), white matter necrosis (Inder et al, 2003), and asphyxia (Hellström-Westas, 1992), applying power analyses to one particular physiologic behavior with little attention to the multiple neuronal networks that contemporaneously express state transitions.…”
Section: Automated Neonatal State Detection Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel approaches to data analysis reveal new information about the behaviour of the neonatal EEG, and it may be possible to identify unique EEG biomarkers. A combination of signal processing and the more traditional visual analysis techniques will undoubtedly shed light onto our understanding of the developing brain for years to come [36,[100][101][102][103][104] . In addition, it is now possible to combine other physiological data and complimentary tools with EEG to provide a more comprehensive overview of neonatal brain health [105][106][107] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experts attempt to assess brain maturity by visual analysis of age-related patterns in electroencephalograms (EEG) recorded from sleeping newborns (Tharp 1990;Holthausen et al 2000). The analysis can take hours of expert work to confidently interpret sleep EEG, as the age-related patterns widely vary during sleep hours as well as between patients, and there are no regular rules for interpretation of these patterns (Cooper et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%