2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.11.532201
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain fingerprinting using EEG graph inference

Abstract: Taking advantage of the human brain functional connectome as an individual's fingerprint has attracted great research in recent years. Conventionally, Pearson correlation between regional time-courses is used as a pairwise measure for each edge weight of the connectome. Building upon recent advances in graph signal processing, we propose here to estimate the graph structure as a whole by considering all time-courses at once. Using data from two publicly available datasets, we show the superior performance of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The secondary objective of this work is to present a novel calssification architecture that jointly performs subject-identification and task-decoding using a single trained model. Subject-identification is conventionally performed via building an identifiability matrix via correlations between test and re-test FC graphs [8, 9, 10], whereas for task-decoding, using support vector machines [11, 5] is the more common approach. In this study, we leverage the power of neural networks and develop a multi-task neural network (MTNN) model, which optimizes for multiple losses simultaneously, offering advantages such as enhanced generalizability and reduced overfitting [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary objective of this work is to present a novel calssification architecture that jointly performs subject-identification and task-decoding using a single trained model. Subject-identification is conventionally performed via building an identifiability matrix via correlations between test and re-test FC graphs [8, 9, 10], whereas for task-decoding, using support vector machines [11, 5] is the more common approach. In this study, we leverage the power of neural networks and develop a multi-task neural network (MTNN) model, which optimizes for multiple losses simultaneously, offering advantages such as enhanced generalizability and reduced overfitting [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%