2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1054-3589(04)50014-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain–Fluid Barriers: Relevance for Theoretical Controversies Regarding Vasopressin and Oxytocin Memory Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed mechanism of brain penetration of OT and AVP following different methods of administration and the relationship between plasma and central OT and AVP (including possible cross-talks of these neuropeptides at their respective central receptors) is an area that warrants further investigation [111]. In addition to in vitro studies on binding sites in the human brain [106] and recent advances made in identifying neural activity using fMRI [68], the development of specific radioactive labeling of neuropeptides in positron emission tomography will provide a better understanding about how OT and AVP receptors are mapped in the human brain.…”
Section: Methodological Approaches In Human Neuropeptide Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed mechanism of brain penetration of OT and AVP following different methods of administration and the relationship between plasma and central OT and AVP (including possible cross-talks of these neuropeptides at their respective central receptors) is an area that warrants further investigation [111]. In addition to in vitro studies on binding sites in the human brain [106] and recent advances made in identifying neural activity using fMRI [68], the development of specific radioactive labeling of neuropeptides in positron emission tomography will provide a better understanding about how OT and AVP receptors are mapped in the human brain.…”
Section: Methodological Approaches In Human Neuropeptide Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This constitutes approximately 0.001% of the administered dose. Oxytocin does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier (McEwen, 2004) and peripheral administration also results in 0.002-0.02% of the dose reaching the brain in rats (Mens et al, 1983; 0.002% in CSF 10 min post-subcutaneous administration of 5 ug; Kang and Park, 2000: 0.02% in brain tissues 60 min post-intravenous administration of 23 ng). Even if such a small proportion accesses the brain, the common dose used in psychiatric studies of 24 IU equivalent to 50 ug should still provide 50 ng reaching the CSF, while baseline endogenous CSF OT concentrations in humans are commonly reported in the range of 15-20 pg/mL (Kagerbauer et al, 2013;Striepens et al, 2013), hence a supra-physiological dose.…”
Section: Intranasal Oxytocin Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is despite the majority of studies reporting no consistent correlation between central and peripheral OT changes (Perlow et al, 1982;Amico et al, 1990;Kendrick et al, 1991;Winslow et al, 2003;Jokinen et al, 2012;Kagerbauer et al, 2013;Striepens et al, 2013). This is attributed to central and peripheral release patterns being governed by separate systems, and the poor ability for OT to cross the blood-brain barrier (McEwen, 2004). In addition, concerns exist with analysis of OT in plasma or serum samples without prior extraction, often against the assay kit manufacturer recommendation, or without proper validation (McCullough et al, 2013;Christensen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OT is released peripherally primarily from the neurohypophysis by exocytosis (Carson et al, 2013; Viero et al, 2010). Since OT is a relatively large, hydrophilic molecule, blood-brain penetration is too poor to cause any measurable effects on central systems (McEwen, 2004), so peripheral OT likely re-enters the brain in negligible amounts. Instead, OT is released directly in the CNS by OT neurons that project to numerous brain regions from the PVN, separate from those that go to the pituitary (Ross and Young, 2009; Veening et al, 2010).…”
Section: Intranasal Delivery: Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%