1982
DOI: 10.1042/bst0100369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain glutaminase activity in relation to transmitter glutamate biosynthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus chemical stimulation, which evoked an increase in glutamate, evoked a decrease in glutamine, whereas the decrease in glutamate following application of Lproline or 2CA or after cortical ablation was accompanied by an increase in glutamine. Previous investigators have reported similar inverse relationships between responses of glutamate and glutamine in vitro (Reubi et al, 1978;Ward et al, 1982) and in vivo (Thanki et al, 1983;Korf and Venema, 1985), supporting the theory that glutamine may be the predominant precursor for neurotransmitter glutamate (Bradford et al, 1978;Hamberger et al, 1979).…”
Section: Amino Acidsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Thus chemical stimulation, which evoked an increase in glutamate, evoked a decrease in glutamine, whereas the decrease in glutamate following application of Lproline or 2CA or after cortical ablation was accompanied by an increase in glutamine. Previous investigators have reported similar inverse relationships between responses of glutamate and glutamine in vitro (Reubi et al, 1978;Ward et al, 1982) and in vivo (Thanki et al, 1983;Korf and Venema, 1985), supporting the theory that glutamine may be the predominant precursor for neurotransmitter glutamate (Bradford et al, 1978;Hamberger et al, 1979).…”
Section: Amino Acidsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Previous reports on glutaminase in striatal homogenates give rates that vary from 4 to 245 nmol/ min/mg protein (Ward et al, 1982;Butterworth and Yates, 1983), which clearly illustrates the varying kinetic characteristics that are seen at different substrate and phosphate concentrations (Butterworth and Yates, 1983).…”
Section: Effects Of Cortico-striate Lesions On Enzyme Levelsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…One previous study found no significant change in striatal glutaminase activity after sectioning of the cortico-striatal pathway (McGeer and McGeer, 1979), whereas another study detected a 20% reduction after employing a lesion technique similar to that used by McGeer and McGeer (1979), but with a different assay for glutaminase (Ward et al, 1982). The reason for these discrepancies is not known, but different assays, survival times, and lesion techniques may explain some of the contrasting findings.…”
Section: Vulmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Phosphate-activated glutaminase belongs to the large group of mitochondria1 enzymes that are preferentially but not exclusively localized to nerve terminals Bradford and Ward, 1976). Degeneration of the glutamergic terminals in neostriatum or cochlear nucleus was accompanied by a small but significant fall (approximately 20%) of glutaminase (Walker and Fonnum, unpublished;Ward et al, 1982;Wenthold, 1980). Immunohistochemical localization has shown that the enzyme is at least preferentially localized to glutamergic terminals in cochlear nucleus (Wenthold, personal communication).…”
Section: Synthesis Of Glutamate In Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%