2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-019-01125-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain invasion in meningiomas: does surgical sampling impact specimen characteristics and histology?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The authors also suggest that surgical nuances among the different institutions might alter specimen characteristics and findings at neuropathological examination. 8 Another work suggested that extensive sampling improves brain invasion assessment, which is in accordance with our findings. 10 The distribution of other histopathological parameters used for meningioma grading have not been studied to our knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 The authors also suggest that surgical nuances among the different institutions might alter specimen characteristics and findings at neuropathological examination. 8 Another work suggested that extensive sampling improves brain invasion assessment, which is in accordance with our findings. 10 The distribution of other histopathological parameters used for meningioma grading have not been studied to our knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…5 The A recent work showed differences among neuropathological departments for the rate of residual tissue not subjected to neuropathological analyses. 8 The authors also found that rates of tissue not submitted for histopathological analysis were higher in high grade tumour than in low grade tumour. We suggest that this might be explained by the fact that grade 2 meningiomas are larger than grade 1 meningioma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, surgical techniques have been shown to have an impact on the rate of microscopically detected BI. A recent study observed a significant difference of the rate of brain tissue in the specimen as well as that of BI among different neurosurgical centres [25]. In particular, random intraoperative sampling that does not precisely select tumour close to adjacent brain tissue may influence the detection of BI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if it can be shown that patients with BI are genuinely at greater risk of perioperative seizures, antiepileptic treatment could be commenced in a timely fashion. Finally, it has been proposed that surgical procedures and the degree of histological sampling may affect the neuropathological diagnosis of BI ( 1 , 36 38 ). Preoperative BI awareness should be demonstrated in communication among neurosurgeons and neuropathologists, enhancing neuropathological diagnosis precision by taking strategic measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several operation-related variables, including partial resection and the use of a cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA), appear to be relevant to the reduced ease of access to CNS tissue. Timme et al demonstrated that microsurgery nuances could affect the existence of CNS parenchyma on meningioma specimens and thus change the efficiency of BI detection ( 38 ). Histopathological sampling methods may also affect the evaluation of BI ( 7 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%