Advances in Vertebrate Neuroethology 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4412-4_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Mechanisms of Visual Localization by Frogs and Toads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SC is highly preserved phylogenetically (Dean et al, 1989), and it has been central for guiding and coordinating visual orienting in species with a far simpler visual system than primates (Ingle, 1983). The short latency transient visual response associated with evolutionarily older achromatic pathways (e.g., retinotectal path) provides a rich spatial signal for reflexive orienting (Boehnke and Munoz, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SC is highly preserved phylogenetically (Dean et al, 1989), and it has been central for guiding and coordinating visual orienting in species with a far simpler visual system than primates (Ingle, 1983). The short latency transient visual response associated with evolutionarily older achromatic pathways (e.g., retinotectal path) provides a rich spatial signal for reflexive orienting (Boehnke and Munoz, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At one end of the continuum, we find predators that, by relying primarily on a few key prey features ['sign stimuli' (Tinbergen, 1951)], make rapid decisions and do minimal classifying of prey into particular types. Of particular note are the remarkably similar prey identification algorithms used by neurologically diverse animals, including amphibians (Ingle, 1983;Ewert, 2004), cuttlefish (Darmaillacq et al, 2004) and mantises (Prete et al, 2011). In some of these examples, such as frogs and toads, predators rapidly capture prey with a ballistic flick of the tongue after swift, efficient classification based on seeing an object of a specific size range moving in a specific orientation (Barlow, 1953;Lettvin et al, 1959;Ewert, 1997;Ewert, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the 'software' versus the 'hardware', respectively (Ewert, 2004)]. This is evidenced by the similarities in the preyrecognition algorithms used by animals with very different brains, for instance, amphibians (Ingle, 1983;Roth, 1987;Ewert, 2004), the amphibious fish Periophthalmus koehlreuteri (Ewert, 2004), cuttlefish (Darmaillacq et al, 2004) and mantises (Kral and Prete, 2004). Even more interesting is the fact that creatures much smaller than mantises, for instance, the jumping spider Evarcha culicivora, can combine different subsets of category-specific stimulus elements into a coherent perception of a potential prey item (Nelson and Jackson, 2012; see also Harland and Jackson, 2000).…”
Section: Implicit Representation Of Preymentioning
confidence: 99%