Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, remains one of the least treatable cancers. Current standard of care-combining surgical resection, radiation, and alkylating chemotherapy-results in a median survival of only 15 months. Despite decades of investment and research into the development of new therapies, most candidate anti-glioma compounds fail to translate into effective treatments in clinical trials. One key issue underlying this failure of therapies that work in pre-clinical models to generate meaningful improvement in human patients is the profound mismatch between drug discovery systems-cell cultures and mouse models-and the actual tumors they are supposed to imitate. Indeed, current strategies that evaluate the effects of novel treatments on GBM cells in vitro fail to account for a wide range of factors known to influence tumor growth. These include secreted factors, the brain's unique extracellular matrix, circulatory structures, the presence of non-tumor brain cells, and nutrient sources available for tumor metabolism. While mouse models provide a more realistic testing ground for potential therapies, they still fail to account for the full complexity of tumor-microenvironment interactions, as well as the role of the immune system. Based on the limitations of current models, researchers have begun to develop and implement novel culture systems that better recapitulate the complex reality of brain tumors growing in situ. A rise in the use of patient derived cells, creative combinations of added growth factors and supplements, may provide a more effective proving ground for the development of novel therapies. This review will summarize and analyze these exciting developments in 3D culturing systems. Special attention will be paid to how they enhance the design and identification of compounds that increase the efficacy of radiotherapy, a bedrock of GBM treatment.In order to discuss the potential of novel culture systems to more effectively ascertain the clinical potential of candidate compounds, we must first discuss the current state of GBM culture and murine models. Further, we must delineate how the immense complexity of brain tumor genetics and the vast influence of the brain microenvironment limit their utility. Figure 1 illustrates the current mismatch between tumors growing in patients and present culture protocols.
Current practices for pre-clinical GBM modelingAt present, the gold standard of GBM in vitro culture systems relies on the use of patient derived (PD) cells. Human immortalized glioma cells, such as U87 and U251, have fallen out of favor due to lack of similarity to actual GBM tumor cells and controversy regarding their origins 9 . In their place, a variety of PD lines have been developed. These cells are derived from the tumor tissue removed during surgical resection, which is processed to generate cell lines that can be passaged through the flanks of immunodefficient mice and cultured as monolayers or in suspension. A wide number of these cell...