2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0784-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain MR findings in patients treated with particle therapy for skull base tumors

Abstract: Nowadays, hadrontherapy is increasingly used for the treatment of various tumors, in particular of those resistant to conventional radiotherapy. Proton and carbon ions are characterized by physical and biological features that allow a high radiation dose to tumors, minimizing irradiation to adjacent normal tissues. For this reason, radioresistant tumors and tumors located near highly radiosensitive critical organs, such as skull base tumors, represent the best target for this kind of therapy. However, also had… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should be taken into consideration, especially when compared with older studies, when MRI was not always a routine exam in follow-up and when not all recent and advanced techniques, including diffusion, perfusion imaging, and spectroscopy, were performed. Moreover, in our series, we reported every radiological change in white matter, whether they manifested with edema, with contrast enhancement or with areas of necrosis [37], regardless of the clinical symptoms. In the comparison of the radio-induced brain changes' rates among different series, the criteria adopted to estimate, to rate and to term this outcome can be rather heterogeneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This should be taken into consideration, especially when compared with older studies, when MRI was not always a routine exam in follow-up and when not all recent and advanced techniques, including diffusion, perfusion imaging, and spectroscopy, were performed. Moreover, in our series, we reported every radiological change in white matter, whether they manifested with edema, with contrast enhancement or with areas of necrosis [37], regardless of the clinical symptoms. In the comparison of the radio-induced brain changes' rates among different series, the criteria adopted to estimate, to rate and to term this outcome can be rather heterogeneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Brain radiographic changes were defined as contrast-enhancing brain lesions (CEBL), which were delineated by a medical doctor using the first MRI images where changes have been detected. Based on MRI, such patients were then diagnosed with symptomatic or non-symptomatic brain changes, which according to Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force subjective, objective, management and analytic (LENT-SOMA) were divided into edema (necrosis grade 1, mostly visible on T2/FLAIR acquisitions [22], [23]) or/and necrosis grade from 2 to 3 structure (identified on T1 acquisitions with contrast). Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of patients showing CEBL.…”
Section: Treatment Planning and Patients Follow Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, this could be done by evaluating the accuracy of mapping anatomical landmarks, or by dividing organs into well-defined sub-structures that can be analysed separately. Improving localised mapping is increasingly relevant for clinical endpoints such as brain injury (Gunther et al 2015 , Viselner et al 2019 ), lung fibrosis (Veiga et al 2018 ) and heart failure (McWilliam et al 2017 ). We recommend that in clinical studies investigating organ-specific end-points additional validation is performed accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%