2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain responses to altered auditory feedback during musical keyboard production: An fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the relationship is much weaker, and not statistically significant. In addition to providing a convenient control, this result is also consistent with aforementioned evidence that poor singing is specific to the pitch dimension (e.g., Dalla Bella et al, 2007), and is consistent with recent evidence suggesting that asynchronous AAF influences a distinct neural network from pitch alterations (Pfordresher et al, 2014). …”
Section: Aaf Effects On Singingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As can be seen, the relationship is much weaker, and not statistically significant. In addition to providing a convenient control, this result is also consistent with aforementioned evidence that poor singing is specific to the pitch dimension (e.g., Dalla Bella et al, 2007), and is consistent with recent evidence suggesting that asynchronous AAF influences a distinct neural network from pitch alterations (Pfordresher et al, 2014). …”
Section: Aaf Effects On Singingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Maidhof et al, 2009; see Keller, 2012b), could be predicted based on the beta band synchronization between pFMC and brain regions implementing control adjustments (i.e., lateral prefrontal cortex) (Ruiz et al, 2009). These electrophysiological findings are further corroborated by fMRI evidence demonstrating that the alteration of pitch feedback during piano performance modulates the BOLD signal within the anterior cingulate cortex, as well as in motor regions such as the cerebellum and the supplementary motor area (Pfordresher et al, 2014). Taken together, these data indicate further that musical training leads to a tight coupling between sensory and motor cortices, and that this coupling might underpin the generation of sensory predictions—based on internal models— within the musician’s brain.…”
Section: The Predictive Character Of Action-perception Couplingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…There is evidence suggesting that both regions cooperate in sequence planning and evaluation (Nachev et al, 2008), though the exact function is not yet completely clear. The pre-SMA has been shown to be concerned with complex sequence planning, task switching, resolving conflicts and sequence learning: for instance, increased activity in this region was observed when musical sequences played on a keyboard were disrupted by delay or false notes (Pfordresher et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%