2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Rhythms Reveal a Hierarchical Network Organization

Abstract: Recordings of ongoing neural activity with EEG and MEG exhibit oscillations of specific frequencies over a non-oscillatory background. The oscillations appear in the power spectrum as a collection of frequency bands that are evenly spaced on a logarithmic scale, thereby preventing mutual entrainment and cross-talk. Over the last few years, experimental, computational and theoretical studies have made substantial progress on our understanding of the biophysical mechanisms underlying the generation of network os… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of background noise does not allow the system to quench at the fixed point but perturbs the system in a continuous manner, so that it fluctuates around the equilibrium (Galán, 2008). Thus, consistent with the approach used by several authors (Tononi et al, 1999; Sporns et al, 2000; Galán, 2008; Barnett et al, 2009; Steinke and Galán, 2011; García Domínguez et al, 2013), large-scale spontaneous brain activity is accurately described as a linear stochastic process that is formally equivalent to a mOUP. xi(t+dt)=xi(t)+dtj=1NWijxj(t)+ηi(t+dt), where W ij is the functional connectivity matrix, i.e., the coupling between the j -th and the i -th nodes; x i ( t ) is the neural activity of the i -th node with respect to baseline, measured as the signal from the i -th MEG channel at time t ; η i are the residuals (background, uncorrelated white noise) of the i -th channel; N is the number of nodes (sensors) and dt is the sampling interval (1.6 ms).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The presence of background noise does not allow the system to quench at the fixed point but perturbs the system in a continuous manner, so that it fluctuates around the equilibrium (Galán, 2008). Thus, consistent with the approach used by several authors (Tononi et al, 1999; Sporns et al, 2000; Galán, 2008; Barnett et al, 2009; Steinke and Galán, 2011; García Domínguez et al, 2013), large-scale spontaneous brain activity is accurately described as a linear stochastic process that is formally equivalent to a mOUP. xi(t+dt)=xi(t)+dtj=1NWijxj(t)+ηi(t+dt), where W ij is the functional connectivity matrix, i.e., the coupling between the j -th and the i -th nodes; x i ( t ) is the neural activity of the i -th node with respect to baseline, measured as the signal from the i -th MEG channel at time t ; η i are the residuals (background, uncorrelated white noise) of the i -th channel; N is the number of nodes (sensors) and dt is the sampling interval (1.6 ms).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In recent computational studies, virtual brains modeling diseased states like epilepsy displayed lower structural complexity compared to models of normal neural function [23]. A measure of neuronal complexity loss estimated from subdural electrodes during presurgical evaluation of epilepsy correctly identified 86.7% of the patients with respect to seizure outcome [24], consistently with other reports [25].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Analysis of loss of neuronal complexity has been used to lateralize unilateral TLE and to predict outcome in neocortical lesional epilepsy [24], [25]. Loss of variability and increased excitability was recently noted in virtual brains modeled to simulate pathological states like epilepsy [23]. The correlation matrices of the patients give a strikingly visual representation of decrease in strength and loss of heterogeneity of connectivity in patients with a good outcome (Figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental and theoretical work suggests that this ongoing resting state activity may have an important role to endow the brain with flexibility in dealing with diverse cognitive and behavioral situations (Lakatos et al, 2008; Gong and van Leeuwen, 2009; Lewis et al, 2009; Luczak et al, 2009; Sadaghiani et al, 2010; Destexhe, 2011; Steinke and Galán, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%