Brain size does not predict general cognitive ability within families

Abstract

Hominid brain size increased dramatically in the face of apparently severe associated evolutionary costs. This suggests that increasing brain size must have provided some sort of counterbalancing adaptive benefit. Several recent studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have indicated that a substantial correlation (mean r ‫؍‬ Ϸ0.4) exists between brain size and general cognitive performance, consistent with the hypothesis that the payoff for increasing brain size was greater general cognitive ability. However, these studies confound betweenfamily environmental influences with direct genetic͞biological influences. To address this problem, within-family (WF) sibling differences for several neuroanatomical measures were correlated to WF scores on a diverse battery of cognitive tests in a sample of 36 sibling pairs. WF correlations between neuroanatomy and general cognitive ability were essentially zero, although moderate correlations were found between prefrontal volumes and the Stroop test (known to involve prefrontal cortex). These findings suggest that nongenetic influences play a role in brain volume͞cognitive ability associations. Actual direct genetic͞biological associations may be quite small, and yet still may be strong enough to account for hominid brain evolution. Hominid brains have roughly tripled in volume in less than 3 million years, and little of this can be explained by body size increases (1-4). Because larger brains take longer to mature (5), have very high metabolic costs (6), and reduce the efficiency of bipedal locomotion (because the pelvic aperture must still allow birth) (7), increasing brain size must therefore have provided counterbalancing adaptive benefits (8). Seven recent studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to estimate brain volume have shown a substantial correlation (mean r ϭ Ϸ0.4) between brain size and general cognitive performance (9-16). Although these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the payoff for increasing brain size was related in some way to greater general cognitive ability (g), they do not control for potentially confounding between-family (BF) environmental influences.Family background, socioeconomic status (SES), crossassortative mating, and cultural influences potentially affect both anatomy and behavior in the same direction independently, which could thereby result in noncausal associations between brain size and cognitive ability. These BF influences can be controlled for by asking whether WF sibling differences in brain size are associated with WF sibling differences in cognitive performance. This technique has been used to show that height͞IQ correlations are probably not genetically mediated (17)(18)(19)(20), but that myopia͞IQ correlations apparently are genetically influenced (21). To date, there is only one brief abstract of a WF MRI study of brain͞cognitive ability associations in the literature (16), which found no significant WF correlation between general cognitive ability (g) and MRI brain volume in 40 male siblings (no d...

Twelve-year follow-up study of the impact of nutritional status at the onset of elementary school on later educational situation of Chilean school-age children

“…From the results presented here, we may hypothesize that children with suboptimal HC may have alterations of brain development which become associated with the lowered SES, SA and IA, variables that in the current study contributed to determine the educational results; independent of SES and sex, differences in human brain size are relevant to explain differences in intelligence test performance (Ivanovic et al, 1996(Ivanovic et al, , 2000a(Ivanovic et al, , b, c, 2001(Ivanovic et al, , 2002(Ivanovic et al, , 2004aReiss et al, 1996;Botting et al, 1998;Strauss and Dietz, 1998;Toro et al, 1998;Pennington et al, 2000). These studies found positive and significant correlations between HC, SA, IA, brain and parental HC; however, an absence of correlations between brain size, HC and intelligence has been reported in studies of monozygotic twins or in sisters (Tramo et al, 1998;Schoenemann et al, 2000). Other studies have concluded that head size at an early age is a good predictor of later intelligence, learning, cognition and concentration at school age (Botting et al, 1998;Strauss and Dietz, 1998;Stathis et al, 1999).…”

The evolution of human intelligence and the coefficient of additive genetic variance in human brain size

“…These correlations seem likely to hold within families, and not just between families. Although Schoenemann et al (2000) found a zero within-family correlation between intelligence and brain size in 36 young adult twin pairs, Wickett, Vernon, and Lee (1997) found a within-family correlation of +.25 in 34 adult male siblings. Recent work (Pennington et al, 2000;Posthuma et al, 2002Posthuma et al, , 2003 also shows a substantial positive genetic correlation between intelligence and brain size, confirming within-family effects.…”

A genetic analysis of brain volumes and IQ in children

“…The relation between brain structure and cognition has been studied in genetic informative samples in adults (Carmelli, Swan, DeCarli, & Reed, 2002;Schoenemann, Budinger, Sarich, & Wang, 2000;Thompson et al, 2001;Tramo et al, 1998;Wickett et al, 2000). ), Hulshoff Pol et al (2006 and Posthuma et al (2003) showed in a sample of 135 individuals (existing of twins and siblings coming from 60 twin families) that the relationship between full scale IQ and WMV and GMV is completely mediated by genetic factors, as well as the relationship between verbal IQ and performal IQ and several focal GM and WM areas.…”